- To: <gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gtld-council] Apology
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 11:03:11 -0400
I apologize for what apparently came across as an "accusatory" question
asked of Robing regarding the NCUC's impact statement regarding new
gTLDs. I did not intend it that way as I tried to explain in earlier
email responses to Avri and Mawaki.
I do think though that it would be helpful if we as a Council at some
point would discuss whether representativeness of constituency
statements should be a data point that is included with regard to final
recommendations we make to the Board. From the very beginning of the
DNSO, I have always personally believed that was important. In the RyC
we have imbedded that concept in our Articles of Operation and have
regularly implemented it in our deliberations.
"This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any
unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If
you have received this message in error, please notify sender
immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission."