Re: [gtld-council] PDP Dec 05: Follow-up to 23 June

[Norbert Klein <nhklein@xxxxxxx>]

Ross Rader wrote:
> One must consider that in order for something  to be "shown to be in 
> violation of the laws of the jurisdiction...etc" that some sort of 
> judicial process must be engaged.
> Unless there is some sort of a judicial finding, we would only have 
> the allegation of a violation - which isn't a substantial reason to 
> put the brakes on an application.
Thanks, Ross - this has also been my concern, I wrote so before.

If there is no clear, legal definition what is a "substantial" concern, 
coming from a source which is relevant to have a decisive power, we end 
up to have no clear handle.
The reference to national legislation seems to me the only clear point 
of contact.

Norbert

--
If you want to know what is going on in Cambodia,
please visit us regularly - you can find something new every day:

http://cambodiamirror.wordpress.com