<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gtld-council] Updated work schedule: conference calls 6 & 20
- To: "Anthony Harris" <harris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Liz Williams" <liz.williams@xxxxxxxxx>, <gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gtld-council] Updated work schedule: conference calls 6 & 20
- From: "Rosette, Kristina" <krosette@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 16:54:11 -0400
I can be on Rec. 6 for IPC at the scheduled time.
Kristina
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Anthony Harris
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 11:12 AM
To: Gomes, Chuck; Liz Williams; gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gtld-council] Updated work schedule: conference calls 6 &
20
I am OK with these suggested calls.
Regards
Tony Harris
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Liz Williams" <liz.williams@xxxxxxxxx>;
<gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 11:48 AM
Subject: RE: [gtld-council] Updated work schedule: conference calls 6 &
20
> Do we know that all of the protagonists for rec. 6 can make the call
> proposed? If not, then we will end up just like we did last week.
>
> Regarding Rec. 20, we decided not to have a call for that subgroup.
>
> Chuck Gomes
>
> "This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
> which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
> confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any
> unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly prohibited.
If
> you have received this message in error, please notify sender
> immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission."
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> [mailto:owner-gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Liz Williams
>> Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2007 1:24 PM
>> To: gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: [gtld-council] Updated work schedule: conference calls 6 &
20
>>
>> Hello everyone
>>
>> It seems that a set of conference calls to deal with
>> outstanding issues on recommendation 6 & 20 would be useful.
>> Please see suggested times below and please refer to my
>> previous email for the start point of those discussions. I
>> can co-ordinate both calls if necessary but would ask that a
>> member of each group report to the Committee meeting on
>> Thursday 19 July.
>>
>> Given the current work schedule of other GNSO calls, I
>> suggest two sequential calls on Wed 18 July
>>
>> Recommendation 6 small group: 15:00 UTC (08:00 LA/San
>> Francisco, 11:00 EDT/Washington DC, 12:00 Buenos Aires, 17:00
>> CEST/Brussels/ Oslo, 01:00 Melbourne, next day.)
>>
>> Recommendation 20 small group: 16:30 UTC (09:30 LA/San
>> Francisco, 12:30 EDT/Washington DC, 13:30 Buenos Aires, 18:30
>> CEST/Brussels/Oslo)
>>
>> I hope that this will suit the majority -- it is almost
>> impossible to schedule something that is perfect but this
>> should suit the main protagonists for each group.
>>
>> I will proceed with having the GNSO Secretariat send out call
>> details ASAP.
>>
>> Kind regards.
>>
>> Liz
>>
>>
>> .....................................................
>>
>> Liz Williams
>> Senior Policy Counselor
>> ICANN - Brussels
>> +32 2 234 7874 tel
>> +32 2 234 7848 fax
>> +32 497 07 4243 mob
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|