Hi,
Agenda for our Meeting Thursday 26 July at 12:00 UTC.
Please send comment/corrections/additions etc.
I have attached the latest action item list and recommendations list.
Agenda (proposed
0 - Start of meeting (10 min)
roll call
stmts of intersts update
agenda review
1 - review status of recommendations (10 min)
confirm that current chart contains an accurate picture
- this includes review of results from last meeting
2 - In IG (P) (20 min)
- Use of 'detriment' versus 'material harm' in IG P.
- alternate wording defining 'detriment'
- h1) detriment
The objector must provide sufficient evidence to allow the
panel to
determine that there would be a likelihood of detriment to
the rights or
legitimate interests of the community or to users more widely.
- h2) detriment
The objector must provide verifiable or supported(1)
evidence to
allow the panel to determine that there would be a detriment,
and the extent thereof(2), to the rights or legitimate
interests
of the community or to the users more widely.
(1) please, if such thing is available, replace by an adjective
that would suit (also) the case of prospective detriment or
rather actual detriment whose _effects_ will become _material_
only in the future.
(2) I think evidence is needed not only to establish detriment,
but the extent of such detriment (may be replaced by a better
wording if not Ok.)
3 - In #20 (15 min)
Is the objection panel procedure a matter of
- binary (yes/no) decisions
- or a mediation process
(ref Bruce's email on Rec #20)
4 - Wording consistency between Rec #3 and rec #6 (15 min)
(ref Liz's question)
5 - any new implementation questions that the staff has, (15 min)
esp on numbers 6, 20, P and Q.
6 - review action items (10 min)
- are other meetings required?
7 - other issues (10 min)
<action-items-new-gTLD-07Jul25-1.pdf>
<PDP-Dec05-recommendations-07Jul25.pdf>