I support option 3

[BleuFetish Videos <info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I am a member of the adult entertainment industry. I support Option # 3 of
the March 26, 2010 process options submitted by ICANN for public comment.

I do not support the creation of a .XXX sTLD and believe that the ICANN
Board was well within its rights to deny ICM's application in the 2007 Board
meeting in Lisbon.

Regardless of the option chosen, I ask that ICANN continue to consider the
widespread opposition of the sponsored community in any further decisions
concerning a .XXX sTLD.

If you wish to elaborate:
Feel free to elaborate, if you like. Please be reasonably courteous and
businesslike, as this is an international policy forum.

Background:
On March 26th ICANN responded to the Independent Review Panel's Declaration
concerning the challenge filed by the ICM Registry over ICANN's denial of
ICM's application for the .XXX sTLD. 

ICANN's Board of Directors considered the Panel's Declaration at the Board's
meeting on March 12, 2010, and directed ICANN's CEO and General Counsel to
finalize a report of possible process options for further consideration, and
post that report for no less than 45 days of public comment. 

After carefully reviewing the process options reported, FSC strongly
supports Option #3 of the three options supporting the dissenting opinion
which upholds the 2007 ICANN Board decision in Lisbon denying ICM's
application of a .XXX sTLD.



MJ

BleuFetish Videos