<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Deny .XXX sTLD
- To: icm-options-report@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Deny .XXX sTLD
- From: John Grabowski <jgrabows1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 17:44:52 -0400
To Whom It May Concern,
I operate several affiliate program web sites for the adult entertainment
industry and my business is entirely internet based. In addition I have over
fifty domain names with the dot com suffix which I am slowly developing as
additional affiliate adult entertainment web sites.
If ICM's application were granted and a .XXX sTLD were to be created it
would negatively impact my business. I would need to purchase additional
domains to comply and my existing domains would wind up being valueless.
Also it would put ICANN in the position of creating an entity to impose
regulations and policy for the adult entertainment community-a situation
that could easily stifle what is now a robust adult entertainment internet
presence. I believe that the majority of business owners, employers and
workers in the adult entertainment industry have done an exceptional job at
policing themselves and adapting to the wants and needs of the community on
and offline.
I do not support the creation of a .XXX sTLD and believe that the ICANN
Board was well within its rights to deny ICM's application in the 2007 Board
meeting in Lisbon. The push at that time was by individuals who stood to
gain financially by this major change and it appears that is the case this
time.
It is imperative that ICANN consider the widespread opposition from the
adult entertainment community to a .XXX sTLD as it makes its decision. For
that reason, I support Option # 3 of the March 26, 2010 process options
submitted by ICANN for public comment.
Yours truly,
John Grabowski
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|