<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Choose option # 3
- To: <icm-options-report@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Choose option # 3
- From: "Redstone Solutions" <success@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 10:33:55 +0100
As an affiliate program for the adult entertainment industry, my business'
foundation is internet based.
If ICM's application were granted and a .XXX sTLD were to be created it would
negatively impact my business (with the global recession already taking its
toll). Also it would put ICANN in the position of creating an entity to impose
regulations and policy for the adult entertainment community-a situation that
could easily stifle what is now a robust adult entertainment internet presence.
I do not support the creation of a .XXX sTLD and believe that the ICANN Board
was well within its rights to deny ICM's application in the 2007 Board meeting
in Lisbon.
It is imperative that ICANN consider the widespread opposition from the adult
entertainment community to a .XXX sTLD as it makes its decision.
For that reason, I support Option # 3 of the March 26, 2010 process options
submitted by ICANN for public comment.
Best regards,
Dan Mason
Redstone Solutions
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|