<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Pornography domain? Bad idea
- To: <icm-options-report@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Pornography domain? Bad idea
- From: <seven_siamese_cats@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 17:31:27 -0500
Dear ICANN,
I support Option #3 of the March 26,
2010 process options submitted by ICANN
for public comment.
ICANN should vote to adopt the
dissenting opinion of the Panel's
Declaration on the basis that the Board
thinks that the Panel's majority
opinion was wrong and that the Board's
conduct was consistent with ICANN's
Bylaws and Articles of Incorporation.
We've got too much porn on the net
already. If there were technical AND
legal means to force porn to ONLY be on
a porn domain AND a way to limit access
to that domain, then it might work.
But just adding a new porn domain with
no such technical or legal safegaurds
will just lead to the internet going
the way of CB...
Sincerely,
John Hertig
seven_siamese_cats@xxxxxxx
33774099
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|