I vote for option #3 unles the DOJ first gets their act together and jails current violators of the law.

[Timothy Ganstrom <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Dear ICANN,

I am a recovered ex-addict to Pornography who personally knows the harm to 
relationships that nearly always occurs when a man (or woman) gets pulled down 
by porn addictions.

I support Option #3 of the March 26, 2010 process options submitted by ICANN 
for public comment.

ICANN should vote to adopt the dissenting opinion of the Panel's Declaration on 
the basis that the Board thinks that the Panel's majority opinion was wrong and 
that the Board's conduct was consistent with ICANN's Bylaws and Articles of 
Incorporation.

Without serious 'teeth' in law enforcement for our current obscenity laws, the 
creation of another 'porn-focused' domain would be a huge mistake.  There is 
plenty of material being sold on the internet which is in direct violation of 
current Federal law.  Prosecute first, then perhaps give 'non-violating' porn 
distributors a 'special' place to 'live' on the internet.  But only consistence 
non-violators of current law.

Thank you,

Tim G, USA
[now helping others achieve freedom from Porn addiction.]