Agent address for USPS service... +

["Curtis Neeley Jr." <Curtis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Would you please post a listing for your Agent for USPS service?
I will locate it and am not interested in the board’s opinion or a bylaw or
a dissent.
Posting the address would demonstrate a desire to settle out-of-Federal
Court
I may not be approved but the appeal to add ICANN is pending in
5:09-cv-05151-JLH
Motion for leave to amend Docket 111 has been pending since 03-17-2010 and
every current Defendants has objected.
Read it here:
http://www.curtisneeley.com/NameMedia/MOTION%20FOR%20LEAVE%20TO%20AMEND.pdf
The relevant portions are below.
4.      ICANN Inc.
a.                         ICANN Inc does not allow registration for as long
as desired or require a bona fide product, service, or free speech use for
registration.  This creates a potential that all of the Plaintiff’s current
domains might be subject to the same fate as <sleepspot.com> and
<eartheye.com> in 2003.  This is a detrimental reliance on a scheme to
defraud.  And registration of a domain used for commerce should include all
similar domains.
b.                        ICANN Inc does not require “registrars” to require
that registering a previously registered domain requires a claim of
licensure to use the domain.  Coupled with the short lengths of time domains
may be registered, these acts promote cybersquatting and “parked” or ad
domains and is done to encourage fraudulent “domain portfolios” and ICANN
Inc allows millions of worthless domains to have values licensed to
Defendant Google “AdSense for Domains” or other Search Engine Defendants.

Plaintiff prays ICANN Inc should be ordered to require registrars include
all similar domains with every domain purchased to pursue commerce since
there are no costs involved.
5.                     Plaintiff prays ICANN Inc be ordered to require
registrars to allow for a challenge process for domains not used for a
product, service or free speech use.  This would end all cybersquatting
instantly by allowing juries to decide if spam domains otherwise called
“parked” domains should be transferred to a user for bona fide product,
service, or free speech use instead of an exclusively ad serving domain and
thereby being anticipatory or preemptive cybersquatting for all domains that
could be used for bona fide products, services, or expressions of free
speech.

I believe ICANN has much more to be concerned about than avoiding a lawsuit
regarding XXX.
I will alter my prayer and might settle with ICANN but will not allow search
engines to escape a Jury.

There are settlements beside money for ICANN and a settlement potential for
Network Solutions as well.  I will require significant fiscal incentive for
all other Defendants and only Network Solutions LLC and ICANN Inc. have any
potential of avoiding a jury.

It is too late to avoid Federal litigation on this issue and you already
knew it was coming due to a phone call since the case was first filed and
after Google alleged you required advertisement of expiration dates.  It may
have even been recorded from an “intern” who reported most board members out
of country at the time.  It should be in your office phone logs.

Curtis J Neeley Jr, MFA
www.CurtisNeeley.com <http://www.curtisneeley.com/>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER:  Curtis Neeley suffered a severe traumatic brain injury that
often very negatively impacts his communications.  He is often perceived as
blunt, tactless, self-centered and rude. Although Curtis has a severe
disability, he is determined to continue performing meaningful art.  The
Curtis Neeley Foundation is created to preserve and promote his artistic
photographic legacy.
-------------------------------------------