<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Comments from Chuck Warren re single letter proposal from Afilias
- To: info-scsld-amendment@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Comments from Chuck Warren re single letter proposal from Afilias
- From: Marilyn Cade <mscade@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 10:28:00 -0400
To: ICANN
Date: March 20, 2010
Re: .info - 1 and 2 character proposal: Allocation of .info single
letter names at the second level
I am pleased to see Afilias propose the allocation of single
character second level domain names in .info, through the registry
services evaluation process. My comments will focus on this aspect of
the full proposal that Afilias has made.
ICANN has previously approved similar requests from 7 registries,
including .name; .cat; .jobs; .coop; .mobi; .biz; .pro.
My comments support the allocation of single letters. I am pleased
to see that that the approach proposed by the registry appears, to the
best of my knowledge, to follow the recommendations of ICANN's GNSO
Reserved Names Working Group.Overstock has indicated its interest in
registering and using the single letter - O - in its online identify
and operations, just as it does in itsmarketing and business
advertising of its core business. .info’s proposal will enable
Overstock to participate in the proposed RFP process to propose a
specific plan for use and promotion of “o.info”.
Overstock has stated its support the allocation of single letters by
the various registries, with the understanding that by applying for
the allocation of and using a single letter in any gTLD registry, this
cannot preclude a party from seeking to use a single letter associated
with their trade/brand name in a different gTLD or ccTLD. In today's
environment, companies often develop unique website or web pages for
different parts of their business, by registering and using consistent
identities/ or domain names in multiple gTLDs and ccTLDs. The
consistency of identity is a primary issue to brands that have global
identity, such as Overstock. With the understanding that co-existence
of registration and use in more than one single letter/gTLD is
allowed, as it exists today for other second levelregistrations, I
support the Afilias proposal for moving ahead with allocation of
single letters in the manner they have proposed.
Chuck Warren
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|