<<<
Chronological Index
>>>
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Your Input Requested before 25 July 2010: Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy Part B Initial Report
- To: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>, "ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, irtp-b-initial-report@xxxxxxxxx, steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [ga] Your Input Requested before 25 July 2010: Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy Part B Initial Report
- From: "Jeffrey A. Williams" <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2010 15:28:02 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
All,
One of the easily noticed problems with the report itself is that it is in
.PDF format only and seemingly ICANN has not updated Acrobat with the latest
security updates leaving those of us whom have not able to view the report
fully without exposing ourselves to a security problem and/or breach. That's
simply not professionably acceptable.
But now more to the point regarding Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy
considerations.
What I our members and all registrants opinion is that no registrar should be
able
to transfer or otherwise use for any purpose other than those determined by the
registrant
of any Domain Name without the registrant first approving such a transfer
and/or requested
such a transfer of the registrar and that if the latter that action via a
executable via
web link to be actually effected by the registrant only unless otherwise
requested
by same and that all records regarding that registrants registered domain names
should
be viewable and updatable for accuracy ect. by the registrant only via a
similar mechnisim.
Grace period considerations - If a registrant is late or re-registering
his/her/it's
Domain Name at or near the time of renewal some notice to that registrant at
least 15
days prior and 10 days after the experation date should be allowed befor the
original
registrant's domain name can be sold or otherwise utilized. If such a policy
were or
is to be adopted, the Registrar must than comply and fails to do so
compensation to the
original registrant of record in the above mentioned time period must be
compensated
for the loss if sale or otherwise registrar effected transfer without
registrant
permission, for their expected or registrar recognized loss and ICANN must
seriously
consider dis-accrediting that registrar for improper operation accordingly.
-----Original Message-----
>From: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Jul 6, 2010 3:26 AM
>To: "ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: [ga] Your Input Requested before 25 July 2010: Inter-Registrar
>Transfer Policy Part B Initial Report
>
>
>
>http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-05jul10-en.htm
>
>Your Input Requested: Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy Part B Initial Report
>
>Opening of Public Comment Forum
>
>5 July 2010
>
>The Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (IRTP) Part B Policy Development Process
>(PDP) Working published its Initial Report on 29 May 2010. Today a public
>comment forum opens for a twenty-day period as prescribed by the ICANN
>by-laws. The IRTP Part B WG is looking for your input on the Initial Report
>and in particular on the preliminary conclusions and recommendations put
>forward in the report, including a proposed Expedited Transfer Reverse Policy.
>All those interested are encouraged to provide their input so that the WG can
>take these into account when finalizing its report following the closing of
>the public comment forum.
>
>Background
>
>The IRTP Part B Policy Development Process (PDP) is the second in a series of
>five PDPs that address areas for improvements in the existing Inter-Registrar
>Transfer Policy. The Working Group was tasked to address five issues focusing
>on issues related to domain hijacking, the urgent return of an inappropriately
>transferred name and “lock status”.
>
>The Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (IRTP) aims to provide a straightforward
>procedure for domain name holders to transfer their names from one
>ICANN-accredited registrar to another should they wish to do so. The policy
>also provides standardized requirements for registrar handling of such
>transfer requests from domain name holders. The policy is an existing
>community consensus policy that was implemented in late 2004 and is now being
>reviewed by the GNSO.
>
>Deadline and how to submit comments
>
>Comments are welcome via e-mail to irtp-b-initial-report@xxxxxxxxx until 25
>July 2010.
>
>Access to the public comment forum from which comments can be posted can be
>found at
>http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/public-comment-201007-en.htm#irtp-b-initial-report
>
>An archive of all comments received will be publicly posted at
>http://forum.icann.org/lists/irtp-b-initial-report/
>
>Further information
>
>IRTP Part B PDP Initial Report –
>http://gnso.icann.org/issues/transfers/irtp-b-initial-report-29may10-en.pdf
>[PDF, 765 KB]
>
>Translations of the Executive Summary:
>
> * [PDF, 159 KB] العربية
> * 中文 [PDF, 217 KB]
> * Français [PDF, 160 KB]
> * Русский [PDF, 245 KB]
> * Español [PDF, 170 KB]
>
>Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (IRTP) – http://www.icann.org/en/transfers/
>
>Staff responsible: Marika Konings
>
>
>Glen de Saint Géry
>GNSO Secretariat
>gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>http://gnso.icann.org
>
>
>
Regards,
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 300+k members/stakeholders and growing,
strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
Abraham Lincoln
"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very
often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt
"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability
depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of
Information Network Eng. INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Phone: 214-244-4827
<<<
Chronological Index
>>>
Thread Index
>>>
|