[jig] RE: [jig] Late Comments was Re: brief agenda [RE: [] RE…

["Edmon Chung" <edmon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

ok will update the draft and circulate shortly.
Edmon


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-jig@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-jig@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2011 9:17 PM
To: jig
Subject: [jig] Late Comments was Re: brief agenda [RE: [] RE…


Hi,

Thanks Edmon for the response.

I think I almost understand now.  Probably would have asked a few clarifying 
questions in the call, but I have the gist of it now.

I have trouble finding all of that in the text in the draft, and non 
participants might as well. Perhaps a re-write along the lines you used in the 
reply you sent me would be a good thing.

thanks

avri

On 12 Dec 2011, at 14:59, Edmon Chung wrote:

> Hi Avri,
> 
> Thanks for the comments and suggestions.
> 
> 1. will spell out the acronyms.
> 
> 2. Yes the idea was to list out some examples of emerging industry standards, 
> will edit as suggested.
> 
> 3. 
> ==================
> Furthermore, the JIG also identified a question of whether ICANN should 
> review whether such emerging industry services may be a result of missing 
> service from the root or the IANA TLD database?  For example, should IANA 
> collect and provide information of the list of second level registries 
> operated by existing TLD registries?
> ==================
> 
> This was brought up in Dakar by Patrik and was followed by others during the 
> discussion.  The question should actually be in two parts:
> a. is there a Universal Acceptance and single authoritative root issue if 
> these emerging industry services/standards are not updated in synchrony with 
> the ICANN root zones?
> b. if there is, ICANN/IANA can consider either having some relationship with 
> these emerging standards/services OR consider whether the IANA services needs 
> to be enhanced (the above is the latter)
> 
> And the following (the other part you noted you did not understand) tries to 
> address the former:
> ==================
> Given the importance of ensuring the integrity of the single unique 
> authoritative root for the Internet, should ICANN and exploring explore how 
> it should assume or offer the services for which emerging industry standards 
> are offering, and/or the appropriateness of playing an oversight role in TLDs 
> included such lists.
> ==================
> 
> Does that clarify the issue for you?
> 
> Edmon
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-jig@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-jig@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2011 5:51 AM
> To: jig
> Subject: Re: brief agenda [RE: [jig] REMINDER / JIG WG - 22 November at 1300 
> UTC]
> 
> 
> On 22 Nov 2011, at 03:40, Edmon Chung wrote:
> 
>>> 2. Final Draft for Initial Report on Universal Acceptance of IDN TLDs
>>> 
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Sorry to be late with this, and perhaps too late.  But I read through it had 
> some questions, which are marked in the document.
> 
> avri
> 
>