RE: [jig] RE: JIG Public session in Beijing

["Jian Zhang" <jian@xxxxxxxxx>]

Dear Kristina: 

As Edmon said, more than one of us raised the clashing issue during our last
call. So could we move 30 min up on Monday?

Please let us know the arrangement asap.

Thanks for your help!

 

Jian 

 

From: Kristina Nordstrom [mailto:kristina.nordstrom@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 8:12 PM
To: Edmon Chung; Glen de Saint Géry; Bart Boswinkel; Julia Charvolen
Cc: 'Jian Zhang'; jig@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [jig] RE: JIG Public session in Beijing

 

Edmon, I am sorry about the misunderstanding, I was not aware of the clash.
We had the session scheduled for 16:00 originally but were asked by the
meetings team to move it to 16:30 in order for them to get the schedule
together. The changes might not be reflected on the full schedule yet.

 

Kind regards,

Kristina

 

 

From: Edmon Chung <edmon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 1:03 PM
To: Kristina Nordström <kristina.nordstrom@xxxxxxxxx>, Glen de Saint Géry
<Glen@xxxxxxxxx>, Bart Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel@xxxxxxxxx>, Julia Charvolen
<julia.charvolen@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: 'Jian Zhang' <jian@xxxxxxxxx>, "jig@xxxxxxxxx" <jig@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [jig] RE: JIG Public session in Beijing

 

Ok... just to note... the issue of conflicting time was raised in our
February meeting so this is not a new request...

 

Please go ahead to update the title and description first and will work to
see how we could best work with the schedule.

 

Is it also not possible to move the session up 30min?  Looking at the
schedule, that seems to be an open slot?...

 

Edmon

 

 

 

 

From: owner-jig@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-jig@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Kristina
Nordstrom
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 6:58 PM
To: Edmon Chung; Glen de Saint Géry; Bart Boswinkel; Julia Charvolen
Cc: 'Jian Zhang'; jig@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [jig] RE: JIG Public session in Beijing

 

Hi Edmon, all,

 

I am sorry but the schedule is closed and we can't put in any new sessions.
We will have to figure out how to deal with the slot we have, 16:30-18:15.

 

Please let me know if you want me to update the title and description, that
should still be possible.

 

Best,

Kristina

 

 

From: Edmon Chung <edmon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 12:25 AM
To: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>, Bart Boswinkel
<bart.boswinkel@xxxxxxxxx>, Julia Charvolen <julia.charvolen@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: 'Jian Zhang' <jian@xxxxxxxxx>, "jig@xxxxxxxxx" <jig@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [jig] RE: JIG Public session in Beijing

 

 

Ah ok.

In that case, suggest going back to the suggestion during our call
yesterday, to split up the session:

 

1. Public session (on Universal Acceptance of IDN TLDs): Monday 16:00-17:00
(moved up 30min from original slot)

2. WG session (also open): Wednesday before the 2 council meetings
14:00-15:00

 

Edmon

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----

From: Glen de Saint Géry [mailto:Glen@xxxxxxxxx]

Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 1:16 AM

To: Bart Boswinkel; Edmon Chung; Julia Charvolen

Cc: 'Jian Zhang'; gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx

Subject: RE: JIG Public session in Beijing

Dear Edmon,

Yes, it will overlap with the GNSO Council session and the Council
leadership

has requested that there be no overlapping sessions.

I will refer your request for meeting changes to the name and the day to the

meeting team.

Thanks so much .

Kind regards,

Glen

-----Message d'origine-----

De : Bart Boswinkel

Envoyé : mardi 26 mars 2013 17:53

À : Edmon Chung; Julia Charvolen; Glen de Saint Géry Cc : 'Jian Zhang';

jig@xxxxxxxxx Objet : Re: JIG Public session in Beijing

Hi Edmon,

This wil overlap with the ccNSO meeting and Council meeting on Wednesday

Kind regards, Bart

On 3/26/13 5:49 PM, "Edmon Chung" <edmon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi Julia, Bart and Glen,

> 

>Following up with the room allocation/schedule for the JIG sessions in

>Beijing from the discussions on the call.

> 

>Currently the session is scheduled for:

>Joint ccNSO / GNSO IDN Working Group (JIG)

>Date: 8 April 2013 - 16:30 - 18:15

>Room: Function 8AB

> 

>Currently, the session on Monday overlaps with the APRALO Roundtable on

>IDN TLDs.

>I wonder if it is possible to move it to:

> 

>WEDNESDAY, 10 April

>1530-1700 in Function 8AB

> 

>Also, as sent earlier in the email to the WG mailing list and discussed

>in the call, would like to change the session title and description to:

> 

>===============================================================

========

>Acceptance of IDN TLDs: Community Recommendations for ICANN Actions

>===============================================================

========

> 

>Based on practical operational experience, not all systems (e.g.

>browsers, spam filters, registration databases, user profiles, ISPs,

>etc.) work seamlessly when new TLDs are added.  Users may experience

>failures in resolution or other issues with newer TLDs, which in turn

>impacts consumer trust on the DNS.  The issue of the Universal

>Acceptance of TLDs (Top-Level Domains) is critically related to the

>introduction of new gTLDs, as well as the introduction of IDN ccTLDs.

> 

>This session will focus on the 4 key recommendations from the working

>group to address the issue:

> 

>A. Recommend IDN TLD operators (including IDN ccTLD, IDN gTLD and IDN

>gTLD Accredited Registrars) to support Universal Acceptance of IDN TLDs

>in their own systems

> 

>B. Allocate specific resources for the advocacy of Universal Acceptance

>beyond the development of informational materials and toolkits

> 

>C. Development of informative reference materials for new IDN TLDs

>(including gTLD and ccTLD) to handle issues of Universal Acceptance

> 

>D. Direct efforts, lead by staff, with the participation from the

>community, for further studies to investigate the scope of the issue

>and what other services or actions could be taken by ICANN to support

>the Universal Acceptance of IDN TLDs beyond outreach and awareness

>campaigns

> 

>Who should attend?

>Registrars and Registries, New gTLD Applicants, New IDN ccTLDs.

> 

>===============================================================

========

> 

>Edmon

> 

> 

-----

No virus found in this message.

Checked by AVG - www.avg.com

Version: 2013.0.2904 / Virus Database: 2641/6199 - Release Date: 03/23/13

 

 

 

  _____  

No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2013.0.2904 / Virus Database: 2641/6199 - Release Date: 03/23/13