<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
In re a new .NET contract
- To: net-agreement-renewal@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: In re a new .NET contract
- From: Greg <greg@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 11:42:05 -0400
To whom it may concern;
I have reviewed the IPC's misguided and distasteful request that any new
contract with VeriSign to manage the .NET domain require that a uniform
rapid suspension (URS) system be made available.
The requirements proposed by the IPC are nothing but a thinly veiled
attempt at circumventing the due process guarantees for all parties
that are contained in existing laws and procedures governing lawsuits.
My legal rights and protections as a long-time owner of numerous domains
would be severely curtailed or eliminated by a system which requires
little or no notice, no actual proof of wrong-doing, let alone any
charges actually being brought in any legal environment.
A basic, fundamental legal principle (and right) in my country is that
one is innocent until proven guilty. The IPC proposal that one be
guilty and stripped of their rights merely by a back-room whisper,
rumor, gossip and or other underhanded skullduggery is reprehensible at
best! The IPC proposal strips me of my rights to due process and would
required that I must bear the full burden of proving myself innocent of
any accusation or charge that may not even have ever been brought before
any impartial judicial system
The proposed draconian suspension of access by mere innuendo would
circumvent the existing legal system and protection of individual rights
and cause irreparable damage to the value of my domains and my
reputation, solely for the financial benefit of an elite group, the
dues-paying members of the IPC
Please do _not_ require URS as part of any new .NET contract.
Thank you,
/s/Gregory Bridgewater
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|