Should new generic top level domain names be introduced?

["Matthias Jungbauer" <matjung@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Dear Sir or Madam,

in response to the
Public Comment Forum for Terms of Reference for New gTLDs
I would like to answer the first question
Should new generic top level domain names be introduced?
with yes, they should.

I do see the need for the introduction of new generic and sponsored top 
level domains.

I appreciate if you re-opened the application procedure for new top level 
domains shortly.

My name is Matthias Jungbauer, and I am the initiator of Top Level Domain 
Consulting.

There is a hidden need and demand to make large, shared, complex, private 
and public maintained databases accessible via web interfaces and services.

Primary key equals domain name. Database name equals top level domain.

I do see the need to introduce new database oriented top level domains like 
.isin, isbn, .ean, .bic and .rfid.

I do also see the need to request generic top level domains like .book, 
.movie, .city or .hotel

With best regards and thank you for asking.


Matthias