<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[npoc-voice] RE: [npoc-voice] Re: [npoc-voice] RE: Consultation to all NPOC members regarding IFRC´s request on "¨Protection of Red Cross/Red Crescent Designations in the Domain Name System"
- To: "klaus.stoll" <klaus.stoll@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Eduardo Monge <eduardo.monge@xxxxxxxxx>, "npoc-voice@xxxxxxxxx" <npoc-voice@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [npoc-voice] RE: [npoc-voice] Re: [npoc-voice] RE: Consultation to all NPOC members regarding IFRC´s request on "¨Protection of Red Cross/Red Crescent Designations in the Domain Name System"
- From: "Carson, Michael" <Michael.Carson@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 17:07:06 +0000
We support the following possible approaches (as outlined in the Brian Peck’s
email):
1. Develop recommendations to implement the GAC proposal such as
extending protection to all or a subset of RCRC names only, all or a subset of
IOC names only or, to both sets of each organization’s names.
2. Ask ICANN General Counsel’s office to conduct a legal analysis to
substantiate/verify whether there is clear evidence of treaty law and/or
statutes that would require registries and registrars to protect IOC and RCRC
names by law.
Best to all,
Michael
Michael A. Carson Jr.
Senior Paralegal
Office of the General Counsel
YMCA OF THE USA
101 N Wacker Drive, Chicago IL 60606
(P) 312-419-8668
(F) 312-977-0057
(E) michael.carson@xxxxxxxx<mailto:firstname.lastname@xxxxxxxx>
The Y: We’re for youth development, healthy living and social responsibility.
From: owner-npoc-voice@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-npoc-voice@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of klaus.stoll
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 11:47 AM
To: Eduardo Monge; npoc-voice@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: Hughes, Debra Y.; shankins@xxxxxxxx
Subject: [npoc-voice] Re: [npoc-voice] RE: Consultation to all NPOC members
regarding IFRC´s request on "¨Protection of Red Cross/Red Crescent Designations
in the Domain Name System"
Dear Friends
I think my position is clear on this subject but just for the record: Maintain
the status quo and not provide any new special protections for the RCRC/IOC
names (i.e., no changes to the current schedule of second-level reserved names
in the new gTLD Registry Agreement) and ask ICANN General Counsel’s office to
conduct a legal analysis to substantiate/verify whether there is clear evidence
of treaty law and/or statutes that would require registries and registrars to
protect IOC and RCRC names by law.
Yours
Klaus
From: Eduardo Monge<mailto:eduardo.monge@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 2:14 AM
To: npoc-voice@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:npoc-voice@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Hughes, Debra Y.<mailto:Debra.Hughes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> ;
shankins@xxxxxxxx<mailto:shankins@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: [npoc-voice] RE: Consultation to all NPOC members regarding IFRC´s
request on "¨Protection of Red Cross/Red Crescent Designations in the Domain
Name System"
Dear NPOC Colleagues,
Thanks to those who have sent comments to the International Federation of the
Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC) requests to NPOC´s Executive
Committee (NPOC-EC) to submit a note to ICANN´s board on “¨Protection of Red
Cross/Red Crescent Designations in the Domain Name System.”
There are 5 more days to receive your comments.
Please send in your comments via npoc-voice by July 22nd, 2012.
Thanks.
Regards,
Eduardo Monge
NPOC Communications Committee Chair
Project Development and
International Relations Officer
Omar Dengo Foundation
San Jose, Costa Rica
De: owner-npoc-voice@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-npoc-voice@xxxxxxxxx>
[mailto:owner-npoc-voice@xxxxxxxxx]<mailto:[mailto:owner-npoc-voice@xxxxxxxxx]>
En nombre de Eduardo Monge
Enviado el: martes, 03 de julio de 2012 08:39 a.m.
Para: npoc-voice@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:npoc-voice@xxxxxxxxx>
CC: Hughes, Debra Y.; shankins@xxxxxxxx<mailto:shankins@xxxxxxxx>
Asunto: [npoc-voice] Consultation to all NPOC members regarding IFRC´s request
on "¨Protection of Red Cross/Red Crescent Designations in the Domain Name
System"
Dear NPOC Colleagues,
The International Federation of the Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies
(IFRC), a NPOC member, has requested NPOC´s Executive Committee (NPOC-EC) to
submit the following constituency-wide consultation to all NPOC members
regarding IFRC´s request on “¨Protection of Red Cross/Red Crescent Designations
in the Domain Name System.” IFRC is requesting approval of such consultation
in order to allow NPOC´s EC to submit a note to ICANN´s board.
Find below a short version of the request prepared by IFRC to provide further
insight to NPOC members as to why the protection of the red cross, red crescent
and red crystal designations and related names (designations) in the new gTLD
program is important. This information is complemented with the two documents
attached: 1) letter to ICANN´s Board submitted 15 June, and 2) statement
submitted to the GNSO Council on 23 June.
Please send in your comments on this request and statement within the next 20
calendar days (by July 22nd, 2012) via npoc.voice. Thanks.
As prepared by IFRC:
"We would like to attach Red Cross documents (letter to the Board submitted 15
June and the statement submitted to the GNSO Council on 23 June) to provide
further insight to NPOC as to why the protection for the Movement’s
designations from unauthorized domain name registration is important. Below is
the short version from the Red Cross.
In short, the registration of domain names containing the designations by those
not duly authorised to do so is a violation of international law, which is
sanctioned under the domestic criminal laws of numerous jurisdictions. Thus, a
program that allows the registration in the first instance is very problematic.
Therefore, IFRC has requested that ICANN implement measures to prohibit the
ability of unauthorized persons to register domain names that contains the
designations to confirm with international law.
Regarding the program’s proposed rights protection mechanisms, several of the
operational details for these have not been finalized, thus their utility and
impact on the Movement is difficult to fully assess. The IFRC is also awaiting
clarity regarding the submission of materials related to treaty protection that
would allow the Movement to fully utilize several of the rights protection
mechanisms.”
If these constituency's consultations permit, NPOC-EC could submit a note to
the Board indicating support for protection for the designations in the
following terms:
----------------------------------
To the Board of Directors
• We believe the red cross, red crescent and red crystal
emblems and their designations and related names (hereafter designations)
should be protected at the top and second levels.
• We acknowledge that the unique status of the designations
is based on universally agreed norms of international law, which are binding
upon all States within the International Community.
• The Geneva Conventions of 1949, ratified today by 194
States and their Additional Protocols of 1977 and 2005 specifically reserve the
use of the designations to armed forces medical services and to those assisting
affected persons and communities in times of war and armed conflict. The
global public interest at stake stems from the concern that any use of the
designations by those not duly authorised to do so is liable to undermine the
perception of the designations, as well as the protection that they represent
and symbolize.
• The registration of domain names containing the
designations by those not duly authorised to do so is a violation of
international law, which is sanctioned under the domestic criminal laws of
numerous jurisdictions.
• The protection of these designations does not primarily
stem from their affiliation or association to any particular organisation
within the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement. Also, the
protection of the designations does not stem either from trademark laws. Thus,
protection of the designations should be distinguished from claims made in
regard to names of international or intergovernmental organizations,
not-for-profit or non-governmental organizations.
• We also believe that the GNSO Council’s recommendations
for top level protection of the designations should be reconsidered positively
by the Board and that appropriate measures be immediately undertaken to protect
the designations at the second level."
----------------------------------
Regards,
Eduardo Monge
NPOC Communications Committee Chair
Project Development and
International Relations Officer
Omar Dengo Foundation
San Jose, Costa Rica
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|