<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Icann Board Members: Regarding the .Org tld agreement
- To: <org-tld-agreement@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Icann Board Members: Regarding the .Org tld agreement
- From: "barry" <barry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 11:19:01 -0700
Dear Icann Board Members:
I am writing today to add my voice to the choir of Internet Stakeholders whom
are all very concerned, as they operate in the universe in which you govern and
there appears to be a concerted effort on your parts to dis-enfranchise many of
these Stakeholders by your recent decision to redo the contracts for the
Registries that operate the gTlds .Biz, .Info and.Org
The news that you are considering allowing for the opening up requirements of
the pricing guidelines for their operations clearly appears to fly in the face
of not only your own mandates to govern this medium for the benefits of all
concerned, but further, it clearly appears to erode your credibility as
concerned and mindful stewards over this very important global communications
medium.
It needs to be said strongly and forthrightly that you do not operate a Fiefdom
of any sort. Yet it now seems clear that you are intent on being persuaded by
these very limited member parts of the whole family of Stakeholders to
facilitate only their very limited needs by allowing for them to advance their
own limited cause at the very disastrous risk to the rest of the full body of
Stakeholders under your watch.
The act of allowing for the unfettered and unlimited pricing for the
administration of the Domains under each of their controls spells massive
trouble for this emerging medium and its large and diverse user members.
You are NOT in the position to advance the cause and benefits of a few in this
formula, but rather, to administer the resource that is the Internet with a
fully Democratic view towards the full user base.
In allowing for the unchecked pricing for the administration of these Domains
you are allowing for those benefits to accrue to those few who to date have
shown little regard for their own mandates to administer each Registry for the
benefit of its users.
None of the Registries that operate these gTLD's to date have done anything to
raise the quality of the experience for their users.
They have not invested any real monies to make certain that they are in
position to properly advance their mandates according to their original
provisions for their operations. There is NO sound plausible reasoning for
allowing them to raise prices, they have NO exposure whatsoever to any rising
costs that would in any functional way impact their capacity to continue
delivering their services in accordance with their contracts.
None of the Registries that operate any of the gTLD's have a business model or
process that causes them to have to have unfettered abilities to manage and
price what is a very static product that they govern.
By allowing for them to become such unregulated Market Makers over their
resource flies in the face of the basic tenets and concept of your own mandate
to be stewards over the operations of the Internet for the benefit of all.
There would be many, many, many current Stakeholders, large and small grossly
and adversely affected if you were to grant this new regime of Monopolistic
Market Makers this type of new agreement, which would actually be the
antithesis of your own mandate.
As you are a Global Organization with a clear and concise goal, this would be
bringing great scorn and ridicule to an already suspect process that clearly
appears to be under siege.
Your inabilities to harness the full and proper public opinion necessary to
fully understand the implications and ramifications to the large body of
Stakeholders puts you in an untenable position of acting against the interests
of the whole for the egregious benefits of the powerful few.
This would clearly paint you as what many today already perceive you to be, a
patron to their interests !!!
What the Global Community needs LESS of, is this heavy handed self serving that
goes on when the Masters of the Medium appear to be capitulating under the
weight of their obligation to serve.
DO NOT surrender the rights of the many for the benefits of the few no matter
what you do.
Let those who follow in all of our footsteps come to know that the foundational
members of the organization who were given the role of stewardship over this
great new communications medium acted adroitly and appropriately to safeguard
the long term viabilities for the masses under whose watchful eyes it was
allowed to grow and flourish unfettered by the willfulness of those few elite
members who would have them do otherwise.
Choose Integrity, Choose Independence, Choose Ethics, Choose Righteousness !!!
Very Sincerely,
Barry and Sally Letzer
Small Business Owners
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|