<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
We strongly disapprove of Public Interest Registry's proposed .org registry agreement
- To: <org-tld-agreement@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: We strongly disapprove of Public Interest Registry's proposed .org registry agreement
- From: "Prophet Partners Inc." <Domains@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 19:47:14 -0400
August 28, 2006
We are deeply concerned that ICANN is seriously considering the approval of
Public Interest Registry's proposed .org registry agreement, as well as the
proposed registry agreements by Afilias for .info and NeuStar for .biz. We
believe that all three proposals contain powerful and dangerous clauses that
are both anti-competitive and a stability or security threat to the DNS.
Approval of these proposed registry agreements would also create a dangerous
precedent for Verisign to demand equal or greater concessions from ICANN during
future contract negotiations for the .com and .net gTLD's.
We strongly disapprove of the presumptive renewal clause in the proposed .org
registry agreement that would provide Public Interest Registry with essentially
a perpetual monopoly over the .org gTLD for an infinite period of time. We
believe that the presumptive renewal clause is too lenient as it permits Public
Interest Registry to make repeated material breaches of the contract before
facing any consequences. It only takes one material breach to threaten the
stability and security of the DNS. It is our belief that approval of the
presumptive renewal clause will remove any incentive for Public Interest
Registry to EARN THE RIGHT to be the ICANN designated .org registry. This may
cause Public Interest Registry to become negligent in their registry duties,
and as a result diminish the stability or security of the DNS. The only way to
ensure that this potentially catastrophic situation does not occur is to (1)
limit the length of the .org registry agreement and (2) establish an
independently evaluated competitive bidding process among Public Interest
Registry and other qualified registry operators when the .org registry
agreement is up for renewal.
We also strongly disapprove of the clause in the proposed .org registry
agreement that removes all price controls imposed on Public Interest Registry'
pricing of registry services. Furthermore, six months advance notice by Public
Interest Registry of price increases is simply inadequate and offers next to no
protection for domain registrants. Without knowing a ballpark figure for the
amount of future price increases by Public Interest Registry, it is impossible
for domain registrants to prepare. With the prospect that Public Interest
Registry may raise prices by 100%, 1,000%, 10,000% or more, many domain
registrants will likely be ill prepared for such price increases. To illustrate
such a disaster scenario, think about New Orleans and Hurricane Katrina, when
hundreds of thousands of people were given short notice to evacuate and leave
their homes. It is inconceivable that ICANN would consider granting Public
Interest Registry with omnipotent powers over pricing and a perpetual monopoly
over the .org gTLD. Lord Acton warned that "Power corrupts and absolute power
corrupts absolutely." World history has proven this repeatedly. The founding
fathers of the United States recognized the dangers of concentrated power and
created the three branches of government, executive, legislative and judicial
to keep power in check. The checks and balances of the U.S. political system
are the reasons why we are the most economically powerful country in the world.
Figuratively, this proposed .org registry agreement would essentially greatly
increase Public Interest Registry's executive and legislative powers, while
greatly reducing ICANN's judicial powers.
ICANN is a non-profit corporation that was specifically created to protect the
interests of the public. In our opinion, it would be a gross dereliction of
duty, if ICANN's Board of Directors approved Public Interest Registry's
proposed .org registry agreement. If the ICANN Board of Directors fails to see
the dangers of the proposed .org registry agreement, we kindly ask each of you
to individually provide us with a complete list of your bank and brokerage
accounts and sign over a full power of attorney granting us with full legal
powers over your personal and business affairs. These powers of attorney would
of course be subject to presumptive renewal provided we did not make repeated
material breaches of our agreements.
In conclusion, we recommend that ICANN reject Public Interest Registry's
proposed .org registry agreement in its entirety.
Sincerely,
Prophet Partners Inc.
www.ProphetPartners.com
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|