<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Responses by .biz/info/org Registry Operators are Unacceptable
- To: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [ga] Responses by .biz/info/org Registry Operators are Unacceptable
- From: Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 21:20:17 -0700
Chuck and all,
Easy to answer. From a REAL ICANN membership and donations.
Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> Chris,
>
> Where do you think funding of the application process costs should come
> from if not from the applicant?
>
> Chuck Gomes
> VeriSign Information Services
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of kidsearch
> > Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 9:11 AM
> > To: Karl Auerbach
> > Cc: George Kirikos; ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; org-tld-agreement@xxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: [ga] Responses by .biz/info/org Registry
> > Operators are Unacceptable
> >
> > Then we definitely agree. The only reason I suggest ICANN be
> > involved in
> > this one is that I don't believe a $50,000 registration fee should be
> > charged for someone wishing to create a public benefit TLD. I
> > wish ICANN to
> > waive this fee and make concessions for the creation of dot
> > NGO or NPO which
> > should be a restricted TLD and go to an operator that is a
> > public benefit
> > org.
> >
> > Not my org for those wondering if I have an agenda. I don't
> > wish to run it.
> > I just want there to be a legitimate nonprofit TLD and wish there was
> > representation for public benefit nonprofits within the ICANN
> > supporting
> > structure.
> >
> > Chris McElroy aka NameCritic
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Karl Auerbach" <karl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: "kidsearch" <kidsearch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: "George Kirikos" <gkirikos@xxxxxxxxx>; <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
> > <org-tld-agreement@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 3:11 AM
> > Subject: Re: [ga] Responses by .biz/info/org Registry Operators are
> > Unacceptable
> >
> >
> > >
> > > I think I must have failed to fully express what I wanted to say.
> > >
> > > It's my feeling that any "meaning" that is associated with
> > a TLD is the
> > > business of the users and operator of that TLD, not the
> > business of ICANN.
> > >
> > > So if you (.ewe?) or I (.eye?) want to start up a TLD and
> > say that it is
> > > for people who want to set up a mesh of brain wave transfer servers,
> > > then that's for us to say.
> > >
> > > But it's not ICANN's role to sit up there on its throne,
> > looking down
> > > onto the internet and say "Let there be a TLD named .dog
> > for websites
> > > with content for dyxlexics".
> > >
> > > ICANN's proper role is merely to inquire whether an
> > operator, potential
> > > or real, is adhering to widely accepted, published internet
> > *technical*
> > > standards. And for that they merely need a simple one page
> > checklist,
> > > and a very small ($50?) application fee to cover costs (assuming a
> > > proper sized ICANN rather than the bloated money pit that
> > it has become.)
> > >
> > > --karl--
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > > Version: 7.1.408 / Virus Database: 268.13.5/483 - Release
> > Date: 10/18/06
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obediance of the law is the greatest freedom" -
Abraham Lincoln
"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt
"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402
E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Registered Email addr with the USPS
Contact Number: 214-244-4827
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|