RE: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] statement of interest update for Marilyn Cade, gNSO Councilor/rep to PDP-FEB06

[Mawaki Chango <ki_chango@xxxxxxxxx>]

Marilyn,

Thank you for the clarification.
And Liz, for the bylaw reference; as you can see, good reflexes are
not yet totally in place :)

Mawaki

--- Marilyn Cade <marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Mawaki,
> 
> Just a point of history.  In the past, it has been the tradition of
> the Task
> Forces to determine chair, co-chair, vice chair, and so I wasn't
> "making" a
> decision in any way, but was putting forward an idea. 
> 
> Marilyn 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mawaki Chango
> Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2006 10:17 PM
> To: David W. Maher; Marilyn Cade;
> 'GNSO.SECRETARIAT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx';
> pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] statement of interest update for
> Marilyn
> Cade, gNSO Councilor/rep to PDP-FEB06
> 
> Dear all:
> 
> First of all (I may not be aware of the procedures here, but you'll
> tell me), do we have a structure for the bureau that will conduct
> the
> work of the TF, or is it up to Marilyn to design the structure (she
> first suggested herself as co-/vice chair)? I think we need to know
> what are the positions to fill before nominating people.
> 
> Second, whether Marilyn addresses David's concerns or not, we know
> enough to see that her profile is too much and tightly interwoven
> with versatile business/commercial interests that may at any given
> time interfere with the business we are dealing with here, and
> which
> though _legitimate_, makes it difficult for me to expect from her
> or
> anyone in her shoes to be neutral and fairly balanced as a chair
> should reasonably be. Thus, I oppose her (self-)nomination, either
> as
> chair or co-/vice chair or whatever on the bureau. I think we have
> enough capable people in the TF that are consensual enough to spare
> ourselves lenghty debates on this.
> Thank you,
> 
> Mawaki
> P.S. May be calling in late to the first TF meeting, have to see a
> doctor an hour before the time scheduled for the meeting so I'm
> sending this for my position to be known if you had to make any
> decision before I join in.
> 
> --- "David W. Maher" <dmaher@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Dear Marilyn:
> > I appreciate the fact that you are making an 
> > effort to provide an updated statement of 
> > interest with respect to the activities of the GNSO and the
> > PDP-FEB06.
> > However, the statement below suffers from the 
> > same serious deficiencies as the previous 
> > statement. Every other person who has submitted a 
> > statement has identified specific employers, 
> > clients or other entities represented.  A general 
> > statement of the concerns and policy issues of 
> > your clients does not inform us of your 
> > interests. I believe that you owe us a statement 
> > of the names of your clients, including the identification of:
> > " the independent external dispute process 
> > involving eligibility for registration of domain
> > names, .... [the] mid sized and multinational 
> > corporation.... [and the] global association that 
> > is focused on VoIP and IP networking policies."
> > Also, I believe that you should specifically 
> > identify all "business and professional 
> > conferences" from which you receive remuneration.
> > David
> > 
> > At 11:51 PM 3/25/2006, Marilyn Cade wrote:
> > >Dear Colleagues
> > >
> > >Attached is my updated "statement of interest".  Sorry, Glen, to
> > be late.
> > >
> > >Marilyn
> > >--------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > >Marilyn Cade
> > >
> > >I am an elected officer of and councilor to the gNSO Council
> from
> > the
> > >Commercial and Business Users Constituency (BC).
> > >
> > >After an extensive career in an executive position in AT&T, I
> have
> > founded
> > >and manage a consulting business that is primarily focused on
> > Internet
> > >Governance and convergence issues involving Internet
> > infrastructure and
> > >applications. The primary services provided are advice,
> > >advocacy/representation, and management and coordination of
> policy
> > >development, involving diverse groups and competing interests.
> > >
> > >My business is focused at the nexus of global policy and
> > technological
> > >convergence. The topics I address include, but are not limited
> to:
> > Internet
> > >Governance, VoIP, IP-TV, Data Retention, Internet intermediary
> > liability,
> > >SPAM, ICANN, and cyber security in IP networks. Specific
> > activities of the
> > >business at this time are the external coordination of an
> > independent
> > >external dispute process involving eligibility for registration
> of
> > domain
> > >names, representation and advice to both a mid sized and
> > multinational
> > >corporation on most of the topics mentioned above. I also advise
> a
> > global
> > >association that is focused on VoIP and IP networking policies.
> > >
> > >Other activities include acting as chair of the Global Public
> > Policy
> > >Committee at ITAA; I frequently represent the association?s
> > official policy
> > >positions.  I also convene and coordinate various industry
> events
> > and
> > >meetings on a variety of topics, primarily focused on working
> with
> > industry
> > >to advocate policy positions to various governments and multi
> > lateral
> > >organizations, including the OECD, ITU, CITEL, and APEC. I speak
> > frequently
> > >as an expert at business and professional conferences that are
> > held both in
> > >the US and in other countries. In both of these activities, I am
> > sometimes
> > >remunerated for participation. Such remuneration does not in any
> > way make
> > >such entities clients, nor imply client obligations.
> > >
> > >The clients of my business are concerned about the security and
> > stability of
> > >the Internet, and are strong advocates of ICANN?s role in
> managing
> > and
> > >coordinating the technical aspects of the Internet.
> > >
> > >I do not believe that I have conflicts of interest with ICANN.
> > >
> > > From time to time, I may have clients who have a direct policy
> > interest in a
> > >particular policy area that is, or could be active at ICANN.  At
> > present,
> > >two clients that I advise have an interest in reserved names in
> > gTLDs. I
> > >have disclosed that to the gNSO Council, and to the Business
> > Constituency
> > >and in public statements in the ICANN?s public forum and to the
> > ICANN senior
> > >staff.
> > >
> > >As the clients of my business and their interests change, I will
> > continue to
> > >update my statement of interest.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: owner-pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxx
> > >[mailto:owner-pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> > >GNSO.SECRETARIAT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2006 3:47 PM
> > >To: pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >Subject: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] Updated list of task force members
> and
> > statements
> > >of interest
> > >
> > >[To: pdp-pcceg-feb06[at]gnso.icann.org]
> > >
> > >Dear All,
> > >
> > >Please find attached a revised document that contains an updated
> > >proposed agenda, and an updated  list of Taskforce Members and
> > >statements of interest
> > >
> > >Thank you.
> > >Kind regards,
> > >Glen
> > >--
> > >Glen de Saint Gé²¹
> 
=== message truncated ===