<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] Experts in various areas
- To: "Marilyn Cade" <marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] Experts in various areas
- From: Liz Williams <liz.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 06:34:14 +0200
Thanks Marilyn
This will all get put into the mix. I appreciate the follow up.
Liz
.....................................................
Liz Williams
Senior Policy Counselor
ICANN - Brussels
+32 2 234 7874 tel
+32 2 234 7848 fax
+32 497 07 4243 mob
On 14 Jul 2006, at 23:55, Marilyn Cade wrote:
Dear Colleague, I have undertaken to develop some names in the area
of economics/related studies that can be considered as experts for
the PDP 06 work. However, I strongly urge that we, as Council,
undertake to develop a broader strategy, and supportive
recommendation for the identification, retention, or consultation
with ‘independent experts’.
I’m delighted to see in the Operational Plan identification of the
need for an economist for ongoing consultation for staff, and for
the TFs/Council.
But, since that may take a while. I’ve tried to gather some
possible names. I did a web search, and also talked to the OECD and
to the EC Competition authorities and came up with a few names to
suggest for PDP 06.
Dr. Martin Cave, London
Dr. Andrew Odlyzko, University of Minn., USA
Dr. Sam Paltridge, OECD
Dr. Michael Katz – former FCC and FTC economist
I also think we need competition authorities to ‘consult’ with. The
European Commission has used a firm – Analyses Consulting, offices
in London and US – to study competition. They also have an
excellent report on the status of competition in various markets in
Europe and it might be that we could ‘borrow’ some discussion time
with them.
We can invite experts from government agencies to ‘discuss with us’
and not pay them, since they wouldn’t be able to take compensation.
They would have to be speaking from present positions or views
about their countries’ laws, or perspectives, tough, not
freelancing or speculating, but that kind of dialogue could also be
beneficial.
I suggest that we invite an anti trust attorney – but not the
retained counsel for ICANN, but someone independent, as well.
So, I’d suggest a competition and anti trust authority from the US
FTC, European Commission, and perhaps Australia or Japan. I can get
some names from contacts I have, probably. There is also a
possibility of anti-trust expertise from one of the NGOs.
I’ve been giving thought to the practicality of our calendars, and
we may need to show some flexibility in our scheduling of the
planned face to face.
From: owner-pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-pdp-pcceg-
feb06@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Liz Williams
Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 12:28 AM
To: pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] PDP Feb 06: Preliminary Report
Colleagues
As I haven't received any further inputs since the Marrakech
meeting, I will be proceeding with the release of the Preliminary
Report by Wednesday 19 July, COB Brussels time. This will enable
all Council members the chance to read the report prior to the
Council meeting on Thursday 20 July.
I am working on developing, as per the minutes of the Marrakech
meeting, suggestions for expert materials for the group to review
through August and September. I will distribute a draft for comment
as quickly as I can.
Of course, any questions or last minute comments, please come back
to me.
Kind regards.
Liz
.....................................................
Liz Williams
Senior Policy Counselor
ICANN - Brussels
+32 2 234 7874 tel
+32 2 234 7848 fax
+32 497 07 4243 mob
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|