| <<<
Chronological Index
>>>    <<<
Thread Index
>>>
 
 RE: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] PDP Feb 06 Task Force - proposed   schedule for remaining work
To: "Cubberley, Maureen \(CHT\)" <MCubberley@xxxxxxxxx>,        "Liz Williams" <liz.williams@xxxxxxxxx>,        "Marilyn Cade" <marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx>,        <pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,        "Glen de Saint Gery" <glen@xxxxxxxxx>Subject: RE: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] PDP Feb 06 Task Force - proposed   schedule for remaining workFrom: "David W. Maher" <dmaher@xxxxxxx>Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 14:28:05 -0500 
 I can do either set of dates
David
At 01:07 PM 7/28/2006, Cubberley, Maureen \(CHT\) wrote:
 Good morning All,I have been in e-mail correspondence with Liz 
Williams regarding an updated schedule all the 
work for the PDP Feb 06 Task Force.
 The schedule that follows is based on Liz's 
draft schedule and contains my proposed 
revisions, particularly with regard to meeting 
dates, and some sequencing of items.
 Regrettably, I was unable to participate in the 
last Council teleconference, and according to 
the minutes in the MP3 there was some discussion 
about the timing of soliciting advice and 
dialogue with anti-trust and competition 
experts, and on the date of the next Task Force meeting.
 I have proposed dates for both of these items in this revised schedule.
 Two sets of dates for the next meeting of the 
task force are included here - two days in 
September or two days in October.  These dates 
are based on indications of availability by 
individual Task Force members at the Marrakesh 
meeting, and also on the recent request to come 
up with more than one option for dates.  Please 
note, I have not yet been able to run these dates by ICANN Staff.
 I also ask that we add discussion of this 
schedule to our agenda for the Council 
teleconference, which will be held next 
Thursday, August 3. I realize that this addition 
is one day late for the one-week notice of 
agenda items.  However, there is no 
documentation to be read and considered other 
than this e-mail, so I would ask the Council's 
and Chair?s indulgence in adding this item to next week's agenda.
 
 
 Proposed Work Schedule for PDP Feb-06 Task Force 
 WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 2 1. Distribution of an updated version of the 
Preliminary Report on PDP-Feb06 - Contractual 
conditions for existing gTLDs, which will 
include the input from the Marrakech meeting.
 2. Cut off date for recommendations for expert materials and expert advisors.
 
 
 THURSDAY, AUGUST 3 3. Confirmation of this or an agreed-upon 
revised schedule during the Council teleconference.
 
 FRIDAY AUGUST 11
 4. Distribution of the PDP Feb 06 Expert 
Materials Collection for the use of the Task 
Force Members throughout August and the first 
part of September (Discussion Item:  making 
these materials available on the GNSO website.)
 
 SEPTEMBER 19 AND 20TH, or OCTOBER 12 AND 13
 5. Task Force Meeting
 - consider expert materials and decide whether 
further advice from in person experts is needed.
 -discuss drafting of Final Report; identify 
specific changes and additions to move report 
from preliminary status to Final Report.
 
 FRIDAY OCTOBER 20TH (if Task Force meeting is in 
September) or FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 10 (if Task Force meeting is in October)
 6. Final Report released to the GNSO Council for 
discussion (and subsequent forwarding to the 
ICANN Board at the São Paulo meeting).
 
 That?s it so far. Kindly respond to the proposed 
dates for the Task Force meeting prior to the 
Council teleconference next Thursday.  It will 
save us some time if we have an indication of 
everyone?s availability. Thank you.
 
 
 Best regards,
Maureen. 
 
 
 
 ----------
 From: owner-pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:owner-pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Liz Williams
 Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 2:00 AM
 To: Marilyn Cade
 Cc: pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 Subject: Re: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] PDP Feb 06 Task 
Force - proposed schedule for remaining work
 
 
 Dear Colleagues I have prepared a draft work schedule which is 
just going through the mill now -- my apologies 
for the delay.  We have a very heavy workload 
between now and Sao Paolo (nothing new there) 
but we do want to be sure that we have as few deadline clashes as possible.
 
 I have been concentrating heavily on the new 
TLDs PDP and other projects and this has slipped through my little net.
 
 
 My apologies -- should be done ASAP. 
 Liz
..................................................... 
 Liz Williams
Senior Policy Counselor
ICANN - Brussels
+32 2 234 7874 tel
+32 2 234 7848 fax
+32 497 07 4243 mob 
 
 
 
 
 On 28 Jul 2006, at 00:56, Marilyn Cade wrote: 
 We have lost a lot of time and some flexibility 
due to the gap of time. It is critical to have more than one option for dates.
 Regards,
 Marilyn Cade
 
 
 -----Original Message-----
 From: "Cubberley, Maureen \(CHT\)" 
<<mailto:MCubberley@xxxxxxxxx>MCubberley@xxxxxxxxx>
 Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 15:09:31
 To:"David W. Maher" 
<<mailto:dmaher@xxxxxxx>dmaher@xxxxxxx>, "Liz 
Williams" 
<<mailto:liz.williams@xxxxxxxxx>liz.williams@xxxxxxxxx>, 
"Marilyn Cade" <<mailto:marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx>marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx>
 Cc:<<mailto:jnevett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>jnevett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, 
<<mailto:gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, 
<<mailto:pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, 
<<mailto:m.cubberley@xxxxxxxxxxxx>m.cubberley@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
 Subject: RE: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] PDP Feb 06 Task 
Force - proposed  schedule for remaining work
 
 
 Hi David, 
 
 
 ???. am working on it as we speak, and I will 
get back to you by mid-day tomorrow latest. Sorry for the delay.
 
 
 
 
 Best regards,
 
 
 
 Maureen
 
 
 
 
 
 ----------------
 From: David W. Maher [<mailto:dmaher@xxxxxxx>mailto:dmaher@xxxxxxx]
 Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 3:02 PM
 To: Liz Williams; Marilyn Cade
 Cc: 
<mailto:jnevett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>jnevett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; 
Cubberley, Maureen (CHT); 
<mailto:gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; 
<mailto:pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; 
<mailto:m.cubberley@xxxxxxxxxxxx>m.cubberley@xxxxxxxxxxxx
 Subject: Re: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] PDP Feb 06 Task 
Force - proposed schedule for remaining work
 
 
 
 
 Do we have a scheduled date yet?
 thanx
 David
 
  At 12:16 AM 7/11/2006, Liz Williams wrote: 
 
 
 Dear All 
  Apologies for silence from my end -- I am now back on deck. I will speak to Maureen later my today and 
come up with some solutions.  I realise 
everyone is anxious to get the dates sorted 
quickly and I'll do my best to ensure that 
happens by end of the week this week.
 
 
  Kind regards. 
  Liz
 ..................................................... 
  Liz Williams
 Senior Policy Counselor
 ICANN - Brussels
 +32 2 234 7874 tel
 +32 2 234 7848 fax
 +32 497 07 4243 mob 
 
 
 On 11 Jul 2006, at 02:29, Marilyn Cade wrote:
 
 
 
 recall that some had problems with the last part 
of the week and were asking for earlier in week, 
due to religious holidays. I think we had seen 
support for that... can we get a new proposal 
from staff on which dates? and are we set on L.A.?
 
 Is so, fine by me. as long as we get dates 
confirmed so we can all buy cheap fares. :-)
 
 I am awre that it is expensive to rent a 
hotel meeting room/do the logistical set up. IF 
you decide you want to borrow the AT&T facility 
again, in DC please let me know. there is still 
some cost for physical set up, but the staff 
tehre have reinstalled an audio card in the 
overhead bridge. and have hand 
microphones/stands that can be used. the system 
was not operational for our last meeting due to 
an audio card outage taht occurred with no 
backup. They have solved taht problem, they 
tell me. . The staff did install a wireless 
network specifically for our use and will reactivate that.
 
 On the other hand, if the meeting is in la. I 
would assume that the ICANN technial team will 
handle the set up/technical support for the 
meeting, so that is a benefit to meeting in LA.
 
 
 
 However, you need to let me know asap if you 
want to see if the room is avialable. I looked 
into the cost of airfare and it is pretty much 
the same betwen DC and LA for most attendees. 
The difference imight be the extratime/flight 
for Bruce to come to DC, and for Alistair, who 
would also be coming from points Asia.
 
 
 
 In any case, can we see optional dates from 
staff taking into account the feedback on the 
religious holiday, and a final decision on site?
 
 
 
 
  Mairyn 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 From: "Nevett, Jonathon" < 
<mailto:jnevett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>jnevett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
 
 To: "Cubberley, Maureen (CHT)" 
<<mailto:MCubberley@xxxxxxxxx>MCubberley@xxxxxxxxx>, 
" <mailto:GNSO.SECRETARIAT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>GNSO.SECRETARIAT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <
 gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx: 
<<mailto:gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>mailto:gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  
>, < <mailto:pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
 
 CC: "Maureen Cubberley" 
<<mailto:m.cubberley@xxxxxxxxxxxx>m.cubberley@xxxxxxxxxxxx >
 
 Subject: RE: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] PDP Feb 06 Task 
Force - proposed schedule for remaining work
 
 
 Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 17:06:34 -0400 Are we set with a September meeting in 
LA?  Let?s lock in the dates.  As Marilyn 
stated, the longer we wait the more expensive it will get.  Thanks.  Jon
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ---------------- From: owner-pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxx [ 
<mailto:owner-pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxx>mailto:owner-pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxx] 
On Behalf Of Cubberley, Maureen (CHT)
 
 
 Sent: Monday, June 26, 2006 6:59 AM To: GNSO.SECRETARIAT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; 
pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx: 
<<mailto:pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>mailto:pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
 
 
 Cc: Maureen Cubberley Subject: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] PDP Feb 06 Task Force 
- proposed schedule for remaining work
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Good morning All, 
 
 
 Further to our meeting yesterday, I wish to 
propose a timeline that takes us from here to 
the December meeting in São Paulo.
 
 
 
 
 This e-mail incorporates many of the points in 
the earlier e-mail that circulated yesterday 
morning, under the subject, ?Marrakech Update? 
and also incorporates the dates that were 
included in Bruce?s PowerPoint presentation at 
the GAC meeting yesterday afternoon.
 
 
 
 
 There are two areas where responses to this e-mail are requested.
 
 
 
 Question Number 1.
 September 20, 21 and 22 have been proposed as 
the dates for a face-to-face meeting.  The 
location has not yet been determined, however, 
Los Angeles has been discussed as a likely 
location.  Please indicate your availability for these dates.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Question Number 2. Liz Williams has proposed developing a program 
and schedule to identify and deliver expert 
materials and expert advice to the task force.
 
 Please provide your recommendations for either 
materials or experts, as discussed yesterday.
 
 
 Kindly reply to the entire Task Force list. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Proposed Schedule for Remaining Work. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 1. July 15 Confirmation of schedule for remaining work. 
(This proposal or some amended version thereof.)
 
 
 
 
 2. Throughout Month of August
 Seek expert advice.  (including literature 
search and webinar involving expert individuals)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 3. September 13th Complete drafting of Preliminary 
Report, and circulate to Task Force members.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 4. September 20, 21, and 22 
             Face-To-Face Meeting of Task Force members. 
 Among the agenda items: -           Discussion of impact of expert 
advice on terms of reference and on drafting of Final Report.
 
 -           Discussion of public comment on 
terms of reference and on drafting of Final Report
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 5. October 
             Finalization of Preliminary Report 
             Posting for Public Comment 
 
 
 6. November
 
             Draft Final Report circulated to Task Force members 
 
 
 7. December
 
             Meeting in São Paulo 
 -           Finalize decisions on content for final report 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Looking forward to your response and input to this draft schedule.
 
 
 
 With thanks,
 
 Maureen 
 
 
 Maureen Cubberley, Chair PDP Feb 06 TF
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 <<<
Chronological Index
>>>    <<<
Thread Index
>>>
 
 |