ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[pdp-pcceg-feb06]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[pdp-pcceg-feb06] How the work of the Task Force relates to the renewal process for gTLD contracts

  • To: "Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] How the work of the Task Force relates to the renewal process for gTLD contracts
  • From: "Cubberley, Maureen \(CHT\)" <MCubberley@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 10:59:55 -0500

 

Memo to Bruce Tonkin, Chair GNSO Council from Maureen Cubberley, Chair
PDP Feb 06 Task Force 

Dear Bruce,  

During the Thursday, August 10th, 2006 PDP Feb 06 Task Force (TF)
teleconference, a concern was raised by many of the Task Force members,
and I proposed to make you aware of it by means of this memorandum, the
purpose of which is to seek clarification from the Council and request
that you communicate the contents of this memorandum to the ICANN Board.


I am requesting clarification on how our work relates to the renewal
process for gTLD contracts. The issue was raised in light of the
proposed renewals of three gTLD registry agreements with .biz, .info,
and .org, as announced by ICANN staff on July 28, and which is
concurrent with the Task Force's work to determine the policy issues
specific to the renewal of existing agreements. The Task Force
questioned whether it was appropriate for the ICANN staff to move
forward with registry renewals that cannot be altered by subsequent
Consensus Policies while the Task Force is working on contract renewal
policy in parallel.  

The question from the TF to Council is: 

Given the existence of ICANN by-law annex A Clause 13, would Council
please confirm to the Task Force that should the Task Force's
recommendations lead to Consensus Policy (as described in Clause 13)
that differs from contract wording, then all current gTLDs contracts
would indeed be changed retroactively as a result?  If not, the Task
Force is looking for guidance on how to proceed. 

It is important to note that while most members of the Task Force share
these concerns, there is not unanimity in the group's opinion, and there
was one opinion from the Registry Constituency in support of the
continuation of contract negotiation in parallel with the work of the
Task Force. 

Given the Board meeting of September 13 it may be prudent to have a
reply before then. Thank you for your consideration.  On behalf of the
Task Force, I await your reply.

Kind regards,

Maureen

Maureen Cubberley, Chair

PDP Feb-06 Task Force on Renewals of Existing gTLDs.

 

 

 

 

Attachment: Memo to Bruce Tonkin.MC.04.doc
Description: Memo to Bruce Tonkin.MC.04.doc



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy