Re: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] Definition of Support

[marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx]

I suggest that we focus on the completion of the work, realizing we all have 
existing constituency positions, that will need to be updated once we have 
draft recommendations. 

Then, it will be appropriate to ask each constituency to reaffirm constituency 
positions. At present, the BC reps will be guided by existing constituency 
positions and will note when they are speaking in the TF as an ind. Rep and 
when there is Constituency position. 
Regards,
Marilyn Cade
  

-----Original Message-----
From: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 19:34:57 
To:<pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] Definition of Support

All,
 
 
 
I have not been able to get the e-mails for the PDP group in the past few days 
but was able to view the comments on line.  In response to Avri who discussed 
getting constituency “support” to replace the “individual” responses, the 
Registry Constituency has asked me to post the following:
 
 
 
In preparation of Sao Paulo and the time and resources being planned to 
dedicate to advancing the work of the PDP Feb 06 Task Force, the Registry 
Constituency requests the following information towards the goal of defining
 
"support":
 
 
 
1. Was the position distributed to all constituency members for their review 
and comment?  If so, when?  How much time was given for their review?
 
 
 
2. What percentage of constituency membership participated in the decision to 
support or oppose the position?
 
 
 
3. How representative of the total constituency membership was the 
participation in this issue?
 
 
 
4. What outreach within your constituency's potential membership base was 
performed and, if none, explain the rational of constituency members to not 
perform such outreach?
 
 
 
Not only are these the type of questions required to be asked under the ICANN 
Bylaws, but this type of methodology would add significant creditably to any 
statement of support from a constituency (i.e. "support" can mean a lot of 
different things depending on how representative the process is within that 
constituency.)
 
 
 
Thanks.
 
 
 
Jeffrey J. Neuman, Esq. 
 Sr. Director, Law, Advanced Services  & Business Development 
 
NeuStar, Inc. 
 Loudoun Tech Center 
 46000 Center Oak Plaza 
 Sterling, VA 20166 
 p: (571) 434-5772 
 f: (571) 434-5735 
 e-mail:  <mailto:Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx> Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx 
 
 
 
PRIVILEGE AND CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:  The information contained in this e-mail 
communication and any attached documentation may be privileged, confidential or 
otherwise protected from disclosure and is intended only for the use of the 
designated recipient(s).  If the reader or recipient of this communication is 
not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent of the intended recipient 
who is responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby 
notified that any review, dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of 
this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this 
communication in error, please immediately notify us by return e-mail and 
promptly delete the original electronic e-mail communication and any attached 
documentation.  Receipt by anyone other than the intended recipient is not a 
waiver of any attorney-client or work-product privilege.