Re: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] Proposed Agenda for 23 Feb 19-21 UTC - RESEND

[Mawaki Chango <ki_chango@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi:

avri, i understand we're still talking about 23 january, "tomorrow".
unfortunately, i have to excuse myself not being able to be on this
call. tuesday is the worst day for me in the week (classes the whole
day); monday afternoon, thursday or friday may work better the next
time. i'll try catch up on the postings and call minutes later this
week and see whether i could assist with anything.
apologies,

mawaki


--- Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> 
> Proposed Agenda for Tuesday's meeting.
> 
> I believe this is in keeping with the discussion held last week
> about  
> the upcoming meeting.  with the exception of the meeting 'boiler- 
> plate' the entire discussion will focus on ToR 5, i.e. Registry  
> collections and use data, including traffic data.
> 
> - roll call
> - interest statements
> - agenda review
> 
> - 1st hour:
> 
> Experts round table and Q&A on Registry collection and use of data;
>  
> including the collection and use of traffic data.  This discussion 
> 
> should go beyond an explanation of the contractual conditions  
> relating to data, including traffic data, but should discuss the  
> actual collection and use of data, including traffic data, as  
> practiced today.
> 
> A request for experts was made to ICANN during the council meeting 
> 
> and to the Registry Constituency during the last PDP Feb06 call. 
> An  
> invitation has also been extended to Bruce Tonkin and to Jordyn
> Buchanan
> 
> - 2nd hour:
> 
> -- Substantive discussion of collection and use of registry data,  
> including collections and use traffic data.    discussion could  
> include categorization of the data if categorization is needed to  
> create proposed recommendations.
> 
> -- Begin discussion on proposed recommendations.
> 
> Members of the task force are invited to send proposals for ToR 5  
> recommendations to the list.  We may get to an initial discussion
> of  
> proposals during the latter part of tomorrow's meeting.  We can,  
> however, continue the discussion on the list and proposed  
> recommendations will be the focus of the meeting after next (6
> Feb).
> 
> 
> thanks
> a.
> 
>