Re: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] Proposed Agenda for 23 Feb 19-21 UTC - RESEND
- To: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>, PDPfeb06 <pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] Proposed Agenda for 23 Feb 19-21 UTC - RESEND
- From: Mawaki Chango <ki_chango@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 16:52:22 -0800 (PST)
avri, i understand we're still talking about 23 january, "tomorrow".
unfortunately, i have to excuse myself not being able to be on this
call. tuesday is the worst day for me in the week (classes the whole
day); monday afternoon, thursday or friday may work better the next
time. i'll try catch up on the postings and call minutes later this
week and see whether i could assist with anything.
--- Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Proposed Agenda for Tuesday's meeting.
> I believe this is in keeping with the discussion held last week
> the upcoming meeting. with the exception of the meeting 'boiler-
> plate' the entire discussion will focus on ToR 5, i.e. Registry
> collections and use data, including traffic data.
> - roll call
> - interest statements
> - agenda review
> - 1st hour:
> Experts round table and Q&A on Registry collection and use of data;
> including the collection and use of traffic data. This discussion
> should go beyond an explanation of the contractual conditions
> relating to data, including traffic data, but should discuss the
> actual collection and use of data, including traffic data, as
> practiced today.
> A request for experts was made to ICANN during the council meeting
> and to the Registry Constituency during the last PDP Feb06 call.
> invitation has also been extended to Bruce Tonkin and to Jordyn
> - 2nd hour:
> -- Substantive discussion of collection and use of registry data,
> including collections and use traffic data. discussion could
> include categorization of the data if categorization is needed to
> create proposed recommendations.
> -- Begin discussion on proposed recommendations.
> Members of the task force are invited to send proposals for ToR 5
> recommendations to the list. We may get to an initial discussion
> proposals during the latter part of tomorrow's meeting. We can,
> however, continue the discussion on the list and proposed
> recommendations will be the focus of the meeting after next (6