RE: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] Meeting is 23 Jan at 19 UTC - Today (not 23 Feb)
- To: "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxx>, "PDPfeb06" <pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] Meeting is 23 Jan at 19 UTC - Today (not 23 Feb)
- From: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 10:01:27 -0500
Avri and Task Force,
Please do not take this as any criticism of Bruce and Jordyn, but how
did these 2 individuals get classified as experts in the field of
registry data? I am not saying they are not experts, I am just
interested in the criteria the task force used to determine whether they
In addition, who from the task force made the decision that these were
the 2 experts we were going to rely on? I know I missed the last call
(along with a lot of other people it seems), but I have looked for the
documented procedure on how one gets classified as an expert and who
chooses the experts, but could not find any.
Jeffrey J. Neuman, Esq.
Sr. Director, Law, Advanced Services & Business Development
[mailto:owner-pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 7:49 AM
Subject: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] Meeting is 23 Jan at 19 UTC - Today (not 23
Apologies for the error in the subject line.
The meeting is scheduled, as Glen has announced, for today, 23 Jan.
Unfortunately this was too soon for ICANN to have an expert available
on "Registry use and collection of data, including traffic data."
Bruce is also unavailable, but Jordyn is available and has agreed to
attend the first hour.
> Proposed Agenda for Tuesday's meeting.
> I believe this is in keeping with the discussion held last week
> about the upcoming meeting. with the exception of the meeting
> 'boiler-plate' the entire discussion will focus on ToR 5, i.e.
> Registry collections and use data, including traffic data.
> - roll call
> - interest statements
> - agenda review
> - 1st hour:
> Experts round table and Q&A on Registry collection and use of data;
> including the collection and use of traffic data. This discussion
> should go beyond an explanation of the contractual conditions
> relating to data, including traffic data, but should discuss the
> actual collection and use of data, including traffic data, as
> practiced today.
> A request for experts was made to ICANN during the council meeting
> and to the Registry Constituency during the last PDP Feb06 call.
> An invitation has also been extended to Bruce Tonkin and to Jordyn
> - 2nd hour:
> -- Substantive discussion of collection and use of registry data,
> including collections and use traffic data. discussion could
> include categorization of the data if categorization is needed to
> create proposed recommendations.
> -- Begin discussion on proposed recommendations.
> Members of the task force are invited to send proposals for ToR 5
> recommendations to the list. We may get to an initial discussion
> of proposals during the latter part of tomorrow's meeting. We can,
> however, continue the discussion on the list and proposed
> recommendations will be the focus of the meeting after next (6 Feb).