Re: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] Quick notes on current Draft final report

[Ross Rader <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 7-Mar-07, at 3:01 PM, Neuman, Jeff wrote:

> The reason our claim of scope is different than the opinion of the  
> Task
> Force or Council, is that we (the registries) have contracts with  
> ICANN
> that defined (in certain areas) the scope of Policy Development.

I think this is irrelevant. You are arguing whether or not the output  
of the task force qualifies as Policy Development activity under your  
contracts, I hear the other side arguing whether or not the output of  
this task force qualifies as Policy Development activity under  
ICANN's bylaws.

I think that the first condition can be false and the second  
condition can be true without either parties being wrong. If this is  
the case, then I'm not sure what the real issue is.


Ross Rader
Director, Retail Services
t. 416.538.5492
c. 416.828.8783
http://www.domaindirect.com

"To solve the problems of today, we must focus on tomorrow."
- Erik Nupponen