Re: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] Re: Including SOIs in the report was re: Statement of Interest ...

["Ute Decker" <Ute.Decker@xxxxxxxx>]

Personally,  I think including SoIs may be more distracting than helpful - but 
have no strong feelings either way and am happy to have my initial GNSO Council 
SoI included if need be. 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxx <owner-pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
CC: PDPfeb06 <pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sun Mar 25 09:30:17 2007
Subject: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] Re: Including SOIs in the report  was re: Statement 
of Interest ...

Many thanks.  I'll do whatever the group wishes -- I just thought it  
was some value add for a reader to know who was participating in the  
decision making?
.....................................................

Liz Williams
Senior Policy Counselor
ICANN - Brussels
+32 2 234 7874 tel
+32 2 234 7848 fax
+32 497 07 4243 mob




On 25 Mar 2007, at 10:27, Avri Doria wrote:

>
> On 25 mar 2007, at 07.49, Liz Williams wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Personally, I do not think I would recommend doing this becasue  
> they are not uniform, even if they do try to follow the approved  
> format. And at a certain point they might start to drift toward  
> 'resume' adverts and if that happened, they would need editing -  
> and that carries it own risks.
>
> But as TF chair I would like to hear from others whether they think  
> this optional information - i.e. SOI statements -  should be  
> included in an Index of the TF report.
>
> a.
>
>
>
>> All
>>
>> It's not strictly necessary, but the report would benefit from me  
>> putting the collection of SoI's in the Annex on participation data.
>>
>> I have many of them in my files from other WGs but do please  
>> submit them formally so I have a complete set.
>>
>> Liz
>> .....................................................
>>
>> Liz Williams
>> Senior Policy Counselor
>> ICANN - Brussels
>> +32 2 234 7874 tel
>> +32 2 234 7848 fax
>> +32 497 07 4243 mob
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>