<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Comments of Michael Palage
- To: <ppdrp-15feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Comments of Michael Palage
- From: "Michael D. Palage" <michael@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 05:48:50 -0400
My name is Michael Palage. I am President and CEO of Pharos Global, Inc. a
consulting company that provides management solutions to domain name
registration authorities. These comments are submitted in an individual
capacity and do not necessarily reflect the opinions/viewpoints of any
current/future/past clients.
In light of ICANN’s current vertical integration policy development process, it
is conceivable that there will be common ownership/vertical integration between
registrars and registries in connection with the new gTLD round. If this should
happen it would be important to expand the coverage of the PDDRP to include not
only the registry operator but also any affiliated registrar. This
expanded/group coverage is modeled in part upon the recent changes in the RAA
to recognize group liability for families of registrars. Failure to incorporate
such umbrella coverage would potentially provide registries the ability to
engage in inappropriate activities through their affiliated registrar to avoid
accountability under the PDDRP.
The call for the expansion of the PDDRP to include not just registrars
affiliated with registry operators, but all ICANN accredited registrars has
been previously raised in the public comments of WIPO, see for example:
- WIPO Center Comments on RAP WG initial report: “…it might have been
expected that any such recommendation would have sought to address any
registration authority conduct that may tend to frustrate core UDRP principles
and ICANN compliance conditions, particularly as UDRP panelists have found
occasion to publicly discuss the various, and unfortunately sometimes
repetitive, facets of these issues. That such practices seem to persist
substantially informed the concept of the WIPO-proposed Post-Delegation
Procedure for New gTLD Registries; the concept appears equally appropriate
vis-à-vis registrar conduct. (
<http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/docs/icann260310rap.pdf>
http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/docs/icann260310rap.pdf)
- WIPO Center Comments on Feb2010 PDDRP: “From its role in initiating
the Post-Delegation concept, WIPO remains encouraged by the ICANN view that DNS
stakeholders including ICANN, registries, registrars, registrants, and brand
owners, can benefit from a PDDRP mechanism. […current debate…] misses an
important opportunity to use ICANN’s contractual compliance framework to
responsibly address abusive conduct in the broader interests of the DNS.” (
<http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/docs/icann260310pddrp.pdf>
http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/docs/icann260310pddrp.pdf)
- WIPO Center comments on Final IRT Report: “We recommend an analogous
dispute resolution procedure for ICANN-accredited registrars.
The WIPO proposal for a post-delegation procedure was at first instance
intended for registries within the context of ICANN’s New gTLD Program, and
motivated in part by a perception of converging registry, registrar, and
registrant roles in the DNS. That same argument also applies to registrars in
their potential relationship to trademark abuse. A recent illustration is the
observed conduct of one particular registrar, reported in a WIPO Center letter
of April 9, 2009 to ICANN, and the latter’s subsequent Notice of Breach.”
- WIPO Center comments on Draft IRT Report: “The WIPO Center’s proposal
for a trademark‑based Post‑Delegation Procedure is designed to facilitate
prevention at the source of (large-scale) trademark abuses. (In light of the
perceived convergence of registry, registrar, and registrant roles both
presently, and likely even more so in the context of New gTLDs, certain
observed conduct points to the conclusion that the WIPO Center’s proposed
Post-Delegation Procedure might in our view need to be adapted to apply to
registrars as well as registries.) The Post‑Delegation Procedure would also
provide a foundation on which trademark-based RPMs may be built.”
Respectfully submitted,
Michael D. Palage
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|