CADNA replies to comments on Phase II of the Public Comments Process Enhancements
CADNA is pleased to have the opportunity to participate in both the Comment Period and the Reply Cycle for Phase II of the Public Comments Process Enhancements. Below please find our reply: CADNA concurs with the numerous comments calling for the revision of the Phase II Public Comments Enhancements to include a flexible Reply Cycle. In our previous comments, we suggested a 30 day minimum length for the Reply Cycle. While we still believe that the proposed 15 day Reply Cycle should be lengthened to a 30 day minimum, we believe it would be even more beneficial to stakeholders to implement a flexible Reply Cycle. As issues vary in their importance and relevance to stakeholders, so will the number of comments that ICANN receives. For some Comment Periods, a 30 day Reply Cycle may be more than adequate time to analyze all submitted comments and submit a thoughtful reply. At other times, the sheer volume of comments submitted will require more than 30 days to prepare replies. -- Posie Wilkinson Communications and Marketing Associate The Coalition Against Domain Name Abuse 1632 Wisconsin Ave, NW Washington, D.C. 20007 Mobile: 202.834.7795 posie@xxxxxxxxx CADNA: http://www.cadna.org/ This message is intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and delete this e-mail and all attachments from your system.