CADNA replies to comments on Phase II of the Public Comments Process Enhancements
- To: "public-comment-enhancements-ii@xxxxxxxxx" <public-comment-enhancements-ii@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: CADNA replies to comments on Phase II of the Public Comments Process Enhancements
- From: Posie Wilkinson <posie@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 11:37:59 -0500
CADNA is pleased to have the opportunity to participate in both the Comment
Period and the Reply Cycle for Phase II of the Public Comments Process
Enhancements. Below please find our reply:
CADNA concurs with the numerous comments calling for the revision of the Phase
II Public Comments Enhancements to include a flexible Reply Cycle. In our
previous comments, we suggested a 30 day minimum length for the Reply Cycle.
While we still believe that the proposed 15 day Reply Cycle should be
lengthened to a 30 day minimum, we believe it would be even more beneficial to
stakeholders to implement a flexible Reply Cycle. As issues vary in their
importance and relevance to stakeholders, so will the number of comments that
ICANN receives. For some Comment Periods, a 30 day Reply Cycle may be more than
adequate time to analyze all submitted comments and submit a thoughtful reply.
At other times, the sheer volume of comments submitted will require more than
30 days to prepare replies.
Communications and Marketing Associate
The Coalition Against Domain Name Abuse
1632 Wisconsin Ave, NW
Washington, D.C. 20007
This message is intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain
information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under
applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or
the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and delete this
e-mail and all attachments from your system.