<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Request for additional time on VeriSign's Registry-Registrar Two-Factor Authentication Service proposal
- To: Mason Cole <masonc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Request for additional time on VeriSign's Registry-Registrar Two-Factor Authentication Service proposal
- From: Patrick Jones <patrick.jones@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:00:14 -0700
Mason,
This is in response to the comment from the Registrar Constituency on
VeriSign's request for the Registry-Registrar Two-Factor Authentication Service
posted at http://forum.icann.org/lists/registryservice/msg00026.html. Under the
Registry Services Evaluation Policy
(http://www.icann.org/en/registries/rsep/rsep.html), ICANN is obligated to
review and provide a preliminary determination on proposed registry services
for competition and security & stability issues in 15-calendar days.
ICANN has reviewed the request and notes that VeriSign may deploy as a
voluntary optional service, but if made a requirement for registrar-registry
communications, a description of the two-factor authentication may need to be
added into the Registry-Registrar Agreement (Appendix 8 of the dot-com and
dot-net Registry Agreements). ICANN would publish any change to the RRA for
comment and encourages continued consultation between ICANN and registrars on
operational concerns with implementation of the service on a voluntary basis.
Please let me know if you have additional questions.
Patrick
--
Patrick L. Jones
Registry Liaison Manager &
Support to ICANN Nominating Committee
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers
4676 Admiralty Way, Suite 330
Marina del Rey, CA 90292
Tel: +1 310 301 3861
patrick.jones@xxxxxxxxx
patrickjones.tel
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|