The revised settlement is much too biased
- To: revised-settlement@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: The revised settlement is much too biased
- From: Pete Houston <ph1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 09:48:05 +0000
It is easy to see why Verisign would propose such a settlement, but
there is no reason why ICANN, or anyone else should agree to it.
To give a monopoly a cast-in-stone ability to set above-inflation price
increases is preposterous. The fact the the monopoly in question is
Verisign who have at best a questionable track record in this industry
is just outrageous.
If this goes through it will kill .com stone dead.