RE: [soac-mapo] charter and mission

[Milton L Mueller <mueller@xxxxxxx>]

Antony
That IS exactly what I said. If there is a difference between what I said and 
what Sene said, please point it out to me.

Here's the gist of Sene's comment:


> Sene:
> 
> "So it is -- the more we thought about it, the more we realized that
> this was a very bizarre, if you will, basis for ICANN to create a
> foundation for an affirmative decision when it's used in the treaty as
> an exception.  So, from our perspective, that tells us -- confirms our
> understanding that there is no international law on morality and
> public order.  There is no internationally agreed definition of what
> morality and public order might encompass.  It is determined on a
> country-by-country basis."

Mueller:

To summarize, MAPO explicitly recognizes that there _are no_ globally 
>applicable standards of morality and public order! It is an exceptions 
>process that restricts the applicability of a global agreement within 
>a national jurisdiction.