<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [soac-mapo] Combined draft charter redline for your review
- To: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, <avc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [soac-mapo] Combined draft charter redline for your review
- From: "Frank March" <Frank.March@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 08:34:50 +1200
I have copied the latest text to the GAC list and offered to collate responses.
The absence of any comment to date cannot be taken a being consent at this
stage but I am hopeful that it means general acceptance. I have specifically
asked for early indications that there might be concerns that, at the least, I
can convey to the conference call on Monday 2000 hrs. So far there have been
no comments at all.
For myself (and by implication New Zealand) I am happy with the current text.
That of course is not a GAC view.
----
Frank March
Senior Specialist Advisor
Digital Development
Energy and Communications Branch, Ministry of Economic Development
33 Bowen Street, PO Box 1473, WELLINGTON
Mobile: (+64) 021 494165
________________________________
From: owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
Sent: Monday, 23 August 2010 6:14 a.m.
To: avc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Liz.gasster@xxxxxxxxx; soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [soac-mapo] Combined draft charter redline for your review
I know for a fact that Heather Dryden and Frank March are on the list
and quite sure that the GAC distribution list is on the list so all GAC members
should be able to see the list traffic.
Glen/Gisella - would you please send the list of subscribers?
Chuck
________________________________
From: Antony Van Couvering <avc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Gomes, Chuck
Cc: Liz Gasster <liz.gasster@xxxxxxxxx>; soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx
<soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sun Aug 22 10:57:19 2010
Subject: Re: [soac-mapo] Combined draft charter redline for your review
Is anyone from GAC even on this list? Chuck or Liz, can you clarify if
this list includes GAC members, and if so, who?
I don't want to "out" anyone who wishes to remain anonymous, but quite
frankly the entire point of stopping for a month was to wait for the GAC to
show up. Their members are critical participants, because the previous Rec. 6
foundered on their objection. So it's absolutely critical to have their
involvement. If not, it's a sterile echo-chamber exercise.
Antony
On Aug 22, 2010, at 9:15 AM, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
Thank you very much for doing this Liz. This will be very
helpful.
I note though that all the contributors to date have either
been from the GNSO or ALAC . It would be extremely helpful if some members of
the GAC or ccNSO commented on the edits even if it is strictly in your personal
capacity. If there is no disagreement with the proposed edits, fine; if there
is, we cannot deal with them if we are not aware of them.
Chuck
From: owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Liz Gasster
Sent: Saturday, August 21, 2010 11:47 AM
To: soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [soac-mapo] Combined draft charter redline for your
review
All,
Attached please find a redline edit that should encompass the
edits by Milton, Robin, Avri, Michele, Marilyn, Stéphane and Richard. Please
use this version for further edits.
Also, please let me know if I've missed anything.
Thanks! Liz
newzealand.govt.nz - connecting you to New Zealand central & local government
services
Any opinions expressed in this message are not necessarily those of the
Ministry of Economic Development. This message and any files transmitted with
it are confidential and solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you
are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivery to the
intended recipient, be advised that you have received this message in error and
that any use is strictly prohibited. Please contact the sender and delete the
message and any attachment from your computer.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|