RE: [soac-mapo] Combined draft charter redline for your review

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Avri,

I think it is fair to assume that the GAC is not going to let non-GAC members 
join their list.  I cannot speak for the GAC, but I believe that the quickest 
way to ensure that all GAC members had the opportunity to see the Rec6 CWG 
discussion was to subscribe their distribution list in the Rec6 CWG.  It 
doesn't seem to me that it would have been appropriate to automatically 
register every GAC member on the Rec6 CWG list; that is a decision each 
individual GAC member has to make.

So I think the answer to your question is 'yes', they can see our discussion 
but we cannot see theirs except for any that occurs on our list.

Frank/Glen - Please correct me if I have characterized any of this incorrectly.

Chuck 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2010 4:54 PM
> To: soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [soac-mapo] Combined draft charter redline for your review
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Does this mean they can see our discussions, but we can't see theirs?
> Why do we need separate lists in this multistakeholder environment?
> 
> a.
> 
> On 22 Aug 2010, at 14:14, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> 
> > I know for a fact that Heather Dryden and Frank March are on the list
> and quite sure that the GAC distribution list is on the list so all GAC
> members should be able to see the list traffic.
> >
> > Glen/Gisella - would you please send the list of subscribers?
> >
> > Chuck
> >
> > From: Antony Van Couvering <avc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: Gomes, Chuck
> > Cc: Liz Gasster <liz.gasster@xxxxxxxxx>; soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx <soac-
> mapo@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Sun Aug 22 10:57:19 2010
> > Subject: Re: [soac-mapo] Combined draft charter redline for your
> review
> >
> > Is anyone from GAC even on this list?  Chuck or Liz, can you clarify
> if this list includes GAC members, and if so, who?
> >
> > I don't want to "out" anyone who wishes to remain anonymous, but
> quite frankly the entire point of stopping for a month was to wait for
> the GAC to show up.  Their members are critical participants, because
> the previous Rec. 6 foundered on their objection.  So it's absolutely
> critical to have their involvement.  If not, it's a sterile echo-
> chamber exercise.
> >
> > Antony
> >
> >
> >
> > On Aug 22, 2010, at 9:15 AM, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> >
> >> Thank you very much for doing this Liz.  This will be very helpful.
> >>
> >> I note though that all the contributors to date have either been
> from the GNSO or ALAC .  It would be extremely helpful if some members
> of the GAC or ccNSO commented on the edits even if it is strictly in
> your personal capacity.  If there is no disagreement with the proposed
> edits, fine; if there is, we cannot deal with them if we are not aware
> of them.
> >>
> >> Chuck
> >>
> >> From: owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Liz Gasster
> >> Sent: Saturday, August 21, 2010 11:47 AM
> >> To: soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx
> >> Subject: [soac-mapo] Combined draft charter redline for your review
> >>
> >> All,
> >>
> >> Attached please find a redline edit that should encompass the edits
> by Milton, Robin, Avri, Michele, Marilyn, Stéphane and Richard.  Please
> use this version for further edits.
> >>
> >> Also, please let me know if I've missed anything.
> >>
> >> Thanks!  Liz
> >>
> >
>