Re: [soac-mapo] Final Rec 6 CWG Charter

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

Hi,

>From my listening (from that wonderful 'innovation' - the live streaming), I 
>thought they acknowledged that delivering the report by the 13th was 
>challenging but possible.

What I gathered they thought was close to, if not actually, impossible* was 
delivering a report that had incorporated the comments from the 3 Chartering 
organizations.  Perhaps that is what Alan was referring to as impossible.

a.

*personal view - nothing is impossible in a 'bureaucracy', it just takes 
inordinate concentration of the  will  of many and an indefinitely large amount 
of persistence to produce miracles

On 27 Aug 2010, at 15:07, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:

> 
> True, some on the Council think it is an impossible date, but others don't.
> 
> It cannot be said that the GNSO Council recognized this as an impossible 
> target. That is just not true.
> 
> Stéphane
> 
> Le 27 août 2010 à 17:56, Alan Greenberg a écrit :
> 
>> I note that at the GNSO meeting yesterday, there was a discussion about the 
>> sentence in Operational Guidelines & Timeline that says:
>> 
>> "The Rec6 CWG should deliver a report with comments from the ALAC, GAC and 
>> GNSO Council not later than 13 September 2010 to meet the 11-day advance 
>> publication that the Board requests for its retreat on new gTLDs."
>> 
>> It was generally accepted that this timeline is not at all possible, since 
>> we will have to work rather hard to get a report out for that date, but 
>> there would be no time for each SO/AC to formally incorporate their comments 
>> in that time-frame. There was some discussion that it could be reworded to 
>> say the report was due by the 13th and the SO/ACc would deliver comments 
>> after that date. However, most at the meeting were willing to just leave the 
>> words along, even though it was recognized as an impossible target. 
>> 
>> Alan
>> 
>> At 27/08/2010 11:23 AM, Liz Gasster wrote:
>>> All,
>>> 
>>> The final CWG Charter is attached for your reference.
>>> 
>>> Best, Liz
>>> 
> 
>