<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [soac-mapo] Is selective blocking by local governments really a problem?
- To: Antony Van Couvering <avc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [soac-mapo] Is selective blocking by local governments really a problem?
- From: "Michele Neylon :: Blacknight" <michele@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 22:27:47 +0000
On 30 Aug 2010, at 21:58, Antony Van Couvering wrote:
> What's the conflict between varying degrees of permissiveness and the
> principle of the single, interoperable web?
>
> At first glance it seems intractable. If the lowest common denominator is
> used, so that the entire world will see only what the least permissive
> society allows, then as Avri points out it would intolerable for most of us.
> On the other hand, If local communities are not allowed to block what they
> deem offensive (e.g., much of the Internet, in the UAE's case), they will go
> off and create another Internet according to their standards, and the unified
> root remains an ideal but is no longer a reality. To me, this has always
> seemed to be the biggest conceptual hurdle.
>
> But the problem may not be so great. While Evan's litany of what the UAE
> censors block is shocking to many of us, we should consider that there are
> plenty of instances in the "west" where we are not allowed to see certain
> content. This includes financial information of others, medical records,
> anything behind a paywall, anything that requires a password that you don't
> have. In some hotels and airline lounges, you can connect to the Internet,
> but only browse the company site until the staff gives you a code. This is
> not what the UAE blocks (though they might block this as well), but they are
> nonetheless limitations on our ability to use the Internet. There are many
> such examples.
I could add a few others ..
Schools and educational institutions in Ireland impose limitations on what
students can access.
A lot of businesses restrict what their staff can access
And the entire filtering debate is kicking off again over here .. ..
>
> In each case, you have a local community allowing some content and
> disallowing other content, for reasons of policy, morality, property, privacy
> and so on. And yet we still have a unified root and we still have national
> laws and customs. Local communities must (and do) have the right and ability
> to some or all users from viewing certain content. Everyone does it, for the
> reasons that appear right to them.
>
> From this perspective, what we ought then to consider in our group is not
> what may be sensitive or not, but rather what rises to the level where the
> very existence of the top-level domain causes damage to a large number of
> people. There are obvious examples of such TLDs. For example, the mere fact
> of a TLD whose name mocks or incites violence against some group of people is
> very likely to be intolerable to the targeted group. This, I think, is a
> legitimate reason for blocking a TLD application. If the TLD name isn't in
> itself deeply offensive, then we're talking about content within the TLD, and
> at that point it's up to local authorities, and individuals who use the
> Internet, to block content that they find offensive. That blocked content
> might even include an entire TLD -- which is kind of the premise upon which
> .XXX was built.
>
> This is definitely not the venue for deciding what value system is superior.
> Every society blocks some content, so far without great harm to the Internet.
> So my suggestion is that for the purposes of this group, which is dedicated
> to considering questions of morality, is that we forget about what content
> the TLD is likely to have (a guess at best), and concentrate only on the name
> itself. I think it will make our task much easier.
>
> Antony
Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions
Hosting & Colocation, Brand Protection
ICANN Accredited Registrar
http://www.blacknight.com/
http://blog.blacknight.com/
http://blacknight.mobi/
http://mneylon.tel
Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072
US: 213-233-1612
UK: 0844 484 9361
Locall: 1850 929 929
Twitter: http://twitter.com/mneylon
-------------------------------
Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty
Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland Company No.: 370845
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|