<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [soac-mapo] On "universal resolvability" and useful questions that emerged yesterday
- To: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [soac-mapo] On "universal resolvability" and useful questions that emerged yesterday
- From: Antony Van Couvering <avc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 08:57:58 -0700
If it's ambiguous in one part of the world, then it's ambiguous, by definition.
This should be a very high bar. Who could judge it? A three-part process
consisting of a quick look, a panel, and the Board.
On Aug 31, 2010, at 8:49 AM, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:
>
>
> Le 31 août 2010 à 17:35, Antony Van Couvering a écrit :
>
>> -- Is the meaning of the string unambiguous (there are no other innocent
>> uses for it)?
>
> Anthony, who could judge that? I can think of several words that might seem
> unambiguous in one part of the world but not in another...
>
> Stéphane
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|