RE: [soac-mapo] RE: List of Discussion Threads

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Bertrand.  To the extent that our message subjects can use these titles 
or ones similar, it would make it easier to categorize our discussions.  I note 
that there is already a discussion going on  regarding Universal Availability 
as well as others.

 

Chuck

 

From: Bertrand de La Chapelle [mailto:bdelachapelle@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 3:26 PM
To: Gomes, Chuck
Cc: Konstantinos Komaitis; soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [soac-mapo] RE: List of Discussion Threads

 

Good list, Chuck.

 

B.

On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Thanks Konstantinos.  I will add it as thread # 14.

 

Chuck

 

From: Konstantinos Komaitis [mailto:k.komaitis@xxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 10:42 AM
To: Gomes, Chuck; soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: List of Discussion Threads

 

Thanks for this Chuck, it is really helpful and provides a great outline of the 
issues we discussed yesterday. I would also add the use of 'incitement' as a 
term for the determination of morality and public order. If I recall some of 
us, including myself, do not see how a simple gTLD would be able to 'incite' 
any illegal activity, not at least in the way the term is used in criminal law.

 

Thanks

 

Konstantinos

 

Dr. Konstantinos Komaitis,

Law Lecturer,

Director of Postgraduate Instructional Courses

University of Strathclyde,

The Law School,

The Lord Hope Building,

141 St. James Road,

Glasgow, G4 0LT

UK

tel: +44 (0)141 548 4306

http://www.routledgemedia.com/books/The-Current-State-of-Domain-Name-Regulation-isbn9780415477765

Selected publications: http://hq.ssrn.com/submissions/MyPapers.cfm?partid=501038

Website: www.komaitis.org

 

 

From: owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
Gomes, Chuck
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 3:24 PM
To: soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [soac-mapo] List of Discussion Threads

 

 It seems to me that it would be helpful if we can arrange the discussion into 
discrete topics that would be used for different threads of discussion so as to 
be able to track agreement/disagreement separately for each one.  Here is a 
list of possible threads that I developed from my meeting notes, email 
discussion and the chat discussion from the meeting:

1.      International Principles of Law

2.      Use of 'Morality' & 'Public Order' Terms

3.      Quick Look Procedure

4.      Outsourcing of Dispute Resolution Process

5.      International Center of Expertise of the ICC as DRSP

6.      Incitement to discrimination criterion

7.      Universal Availability Objective with Limited Exceptions

8.      Independent Objector

9.      Timing of Rec6 Dispute Resolution

10.     Standing for filing objections

11.     High Board Threshold for Approving/Rejecting Rec6 DRSP Decisions

12.     String only?

13.     Guidebook Criterion 4

Did I miss any threads?  If so, please identify them.

I understand that these are not all mutually exclusive and that discussion of 
any one thread will likely involve some discussion of other threads as well, 
but by using these subjects in our email discussions, I think we might be able 
to consolidate our work more easily.

Thoughts?

Chuck




-- 
____________________
Bertrand de La Chapelle
Délégué Spécial pour la Société de l'Information / Special Envoy for the 
Information Society
Ministère des Affaires Etrangères et Européennes/ French Ministry of Foreign 
and European Affairs
Tel : +33 (0)6 11 88 33 32

"Le plus beau métier des hommes, c'est d'unir les hommes" Antoine de Saint 
Exupéry
("there is no greater mission for humans than uniting humans")