RE: [soac-mapo] For review - draft recommendations

[Milton L Mueller <mueller@xxxxxxx>]

Of course it is. When GAC (or anyone else) asks for unlimited and arbitrary 
censorship powers the answer has to be "no"
It would be inconsistent with major recommendations (predictability, 
objectivity, free expression). There is no room for compromise on that. 
--MM

> -----Original Message-----
> 
> But isn't  string, meaning & applicant"   a backdoor way of saying
> expected content without using those words?
> 
> a.
>