Re: [soac-mapo] "string only" - clarification

[Konstantinos Komaitis <k.komaitis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks for this Philip - I will be looking out for such a registration :)

Again though I am not convinced about this. According to criminal law, 
incitement requires, amongst others: action, intent and encouragement - I don't 
see how we can ensure through a single string - even the one that appears to be 
against me - that all these requirements are met. Even Carroll yesterday 
suggested that for incitement determinations, context is something that we 
cannot possibly overrule. Criminal law's incitement was surely not drafted with 
gTLDs in mind, but at the same time let's not stretch the law in an effort to 
fit novel issues, such as gTLD strings. We did that in the trademark arena and 
look where it led us.

KK

On 08/09/2010 09:14, "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx> wrote:




Konstantinos Komaitis wrote:
"For me, no string is sufficient enough to incite people to do anything"

How about killkonstantinoskomaitis ?
leading to registrations such as hang.killkonstantinoskomaitis

Not that I propose spending my USD 185k on this : )
P