RE: [soac-mapo] RE: Please participate - another CWG Rec 6 Poll on Issue 5

[Milton L Mueller <mueller@xxxxxxx>]

From: evanleibovitch@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:evanleibovitch@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
Evan Leibovitch

At the same time, there is an intent (that I'd thought had achieved consensus) 
that the Board could contract experts to provide some outside expertise on 
issues that it could choose to accept or reject on its own.

There is indeed consent on that. But if it expert advice it’s not a DRSP and it 
doesn’t make decisions or recommendations that need to be “overturned” or 
“upheld”

To me there's a big conceptual gap between an expert advisory panel and a DSRP, 
but everyone seems hellbent on using the term here because it's used elsewhere, 
even though the purpose of the expert review is different from the actual DSRP 
functions described elsewhere in the DAG. But I digress...

That is not a digression, that is the core of the issue