RE: [soac-mapo] replacement for 2.2 and 2.4 : next try following Mary's and Richard's comments

[Milton L Mueller <mueller@xxxxxxx>]

Bertrand,
The idea of giving governments the right to impose their national law on the 
rest of the world was soundly rejected by the consensus process. It doesn't 
change that by calling it a "community objection" instead of a "national law" 
objection. I hope we don't have to deal with a lot of other procedural tricks 
of this sort as we enter the end game.

Any such amended recommendations will have to go through another polling 
process of course

From: owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
Bertrand de La Chapelle
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 4:54 PM
To: soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [soac-mapo] replacement for 2.2 and 2.4 : next try following Mary's 
and Richard's comments

Should individual governments have objections based on contradiction with 
specific national laws, such objections should be submitted through the 
Community Objections  procedure.

--
____________________
Bertrand de La Chapelle
Délégué Spécial pour la Société de l'Information / Special Envoy for the 
Information Society
Ministère des Affaires Etrangères et Européennes/ French Ministry of Foreign 
and European Affairs
Tel : +33 (0)6 11 88 33 32

"Le plus beau métier des hommes, c'est d'unir les hommes" Antoine de Saint 
Exupéry
("there is no greater mission for humans than uniting humans")