ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[soac-mapo]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [soac-mapo] Fw: Report on Implementation of GNSO New GTLD Recommendation #6

  • To: "'soac-mapo'" <soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [soac-mapo] Fw: Report on Implementation of GNSO New GTLD Recommendation #6
  • From: Sébastien Bachollet <sebastien@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 10:21:08 +0200

+1

And thanks to the other co-chair also.

 

Sébastien Bachollet

 <mailto:sebastien@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> sebastien@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

+33 6 07 66 89 33

 

De : owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx] De la part
de Richard Tindal
Envoyé : mercredi 22 septembre 2010 10:04
À : soac-mapo
Objet : Re: [soac-mapo] Fw: Report on Implementation of GNSO New GTLD
Recommendation #6

 

Thanks Chuck.  

 

You did an extremely good job on this WG.  Very effective  and even handed
throughout the entire process.  Greatly appreciated by all.

 

RT

 

 

On Sep 21, 2010, at 11:58 PM, Gomes, Chuck wrote:





FYI

Chuck

 

From: David Olive [mailto:david.olive@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 06:29 PM
To: Secretary <secretary@xxxxxxxxx> 
Cc: Gomes, Chuck; Cheryl Langdon-Orr <langdonorr@xxxxxxxxx>;
Heather.Dryden@xxxxxxxx <Heather.Dryden@xxxxxxxx>; Frank.March@xxxxxxxxxxx
<Frank.March@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Kurt Pritz <kurt@xxxxxxxxx> 
Subject: Report on Implementation of GNSO New GTLD Recommendation #6 
 

Dear ICANN Secretary:

This Board Communication is sent at the request of Chuck Gomes, Cheryl
Langdon-Orr and Heather Dryden,  on behalf of the Recommendation 6 Community
Working Group (Rec 6 CWG).

This Report published on 21 September 2010 from the New gTLD Recommendation
#6 Cross-Community Working Group (“Rec6 CWG”) addresses implementation of
the GNSO Council’s New gTLD Recommendation # 6 (Rec6).   This Report
describes recommendations for improving the proposed implementation plan for
Rec6 as described in the Draft Applicant Guidebook-v4.

There is consensus among the members of the Rec6 CWG that the proposed
implementation model for Rec6 is flawed in certain respects and can be
improved. The Rec6 CWG believes that the recommendations described in this
Report, as summarized in Section 3 of this Report, and described in detail
in Annex 3, would improve the implementation of Rec6.

We kindly request that this Report be included in the materials for the
Board’s consideration at the retreat.    
 
Thank you for your consideration of this request.

Regards, 



David A. Olive
Vice President, Policy Development Support
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
1101 New York Avenue, NW - Suite 930 - Washington, D.C.    20005
Office: 202.570.7126      Mobile:  202.341.3611

<Rec6 CWG Report- 21 Sept 2010-Final[1].pdf>

 



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy