RE: [soac-mapo] Board chooses to duck responsibility?

[Milton L Mueller <mueller@xxxxxxx>]

I agree Alan, it is a strange statement. If "the existing process" means the 
Draft Applicant Guidebook (DAGv4), then DAGv4 is an implementation document and 
our Terms of Reference clearly stated that we were supposed to alter the 
implementation in ways that responded to the concerns of ALAC and GAC. 

> -----Original Message-----
> 
> What "existing process"? There was a proposed one in the last draft
> Applicant Guidebook, but there is nothing currently "in existence".
> And if we will only use parts of the CWG recommendation that are
> consistent with the original proposal, what was the point of the
> exercise?
> 
> Alan
>