<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[soac-mapo] RE: Proposed Recommendation 6 Consultation
- To: "'Kurt Pritz'" <kurt.pritz@xxxxxxxxx>, soac-mapo <soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [soac-mapo] RE: Proposed Recommendation 6 Consultation
- From: Konstantinos Komaitis <k.komaitis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 09:50:48 +0000
Dear Kurt,
I would also be willing to participate in the new round of discussions.
Best
KK
Dr. Konstantinos Komaitis,
Law Lecturer,
Director of Postgraduate Instructional Courses
Director of LLM Information Technology and Telecommunications Law
University of Strathclyde,
The Law School,
Graham Hills building,
50 George Street, Glasgow G1 1BA
UK
tel: +44 (0)141 548 4306
http://www.routledgemedia.com/books/The-Current-State-of-Domain-Name-Regulation-isbn9780415477765
Selected publications: http://hq.ssrn.com/submissions/MyPapers.cfm?partid=501038
Website: www.komaitis.org
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Kurt Pritz
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 11:28 PM
To: soac-mapo
Cc: Wendy Profit
Subject: [soac-mapo] Proposed Recommendation 6 Consultation
Dear Working Group Members:
I am writing to request a consultation between the Recommendation 6 Working
Group and ICANN staff members to discuss the Working Group proposals and the
our analyses of them to date.
Given our understanding of the Working Group document, ICANN staff made certain
recommendations to the Board during its 28 October meeting that: certain
working group recommendation could be immediately included in the new gTLD
Applicant Guidebook in some manner; and that certain portions of the report
should not be included in the Guidebook, at least until better understanding
was achieved or changes discussed.
The materials sent to the Board for their 28 October meeting made it clear that
additional meetings / consultations between ICANN staff members and the Working
Group might serve to include more Working Group recommendations in the
implementation of the new gTLD policy. The Board then asked if that
consultation could be conducted before the meeting in Cartagena (rather than
waiting to have the consultation at the meeting).
Anticipating that this is agreeable, we can create an agenda and also send the
information provided to the Board for their discussion on the Recommendation 6
topic. I hope we could set the meeting up in the very near future and we will
send out a poll to find the best meeting time.
Thanks in advance for considering this suggestion. I am looking forward to your
responses to the poll to indicate whether there is support for having the
meeting.
Best regards,
Kurt
Kurt Pritz
ICANN
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|