Re: [soac-mapo] Cartagena session on Rec 6

[Cheryl Langdon-Orr <langdonorr@xxxxxxxxx>]

Well anything that can be done should be IMO..

Cheryl Langdon-Orr
(CLO)



On 1 December 2010 09:28, Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I know that late schedule changes are discouraged but I think it would be
> good to follow-up with Staff on this scheduling problem.
>
>
>
> Chuck
>
>
>
> *From:* Heather.Dryden@xxxxxxxx [mailto:Heather.Dryden@xxxxxxxx]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 30, 2010 4:19 PM
> *To:* langdonorr@xxxxxxxxx; Gomes, Chuck
> *Cc:* Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx; soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* RE: [soac-mapo] Cartagena session on Rec 6
>
>
>
> It's true.  I did ask that this session not be held when GAC is in session.
>
>
>
> Heather
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx] *On
> Behalf Of *Cheryl Langdon-Orr
> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 30, 2010 10:50 AM
> *To:* Gomes, Chuck
> *Cc:* Mary Wong; soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* Re: [soac-mapo] Cartagena session on Rec 6
>
> Same here and I also gather same for Heather....of note as well is that
> Heather  said to Chuck and I when this issue wsa first raised, that while
> she also has no details she DID specifically request that any such meeting
> NOT clash with GAC meeting / session commitments => Huge SIGH
>
>
> Cheryl Langdon-Orr
> (CLO)
>
>
> On 1 December 2010 02:30, Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I have not seen anthing about the Wednesday session except what is on the
> ICANN meeting schedule.
>
> Chuck
>
>
>
> *From:* owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx] *On
> Behalf Of *Mary Wong
> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 30, 2010 10:21 AM
> *To:* soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* [soac-mapo] Cartagena session on Rec 6
>
>
>
> Has there been any further information on the above session, scheduled for
> Wednesday 8 December at 11 a.m. (e.g. panelists, moderator, scope etc.)?
>
>
>
> Unfortunately - particularly in the context of our recent discussion over
> the likelihood of any GAC comment on this group's recommendations -
> it's being held at exactly the same time as the GAC discussion of new gTLDs
> and the AGB :(
>
>
>
> BTW, my thanks to Frank and Bertrand for their thoughts on the GAC issue.
> Like I said, I understood that the CWG Rec 6 proposals were not ones
> endorsed by the GAC and that they were not participating in the group either
> as GAC delegates or officially of their respective governments. Nonetheless,
> since the GAC had expressed support for the CWG concept and mandate, it is
> unfortunate that GAC communications on the issue since then have not
> acknowledged or referred to the existence of the CWG recommendations.
>
>
>
> Since the AGB, including, specifically, Rec 6, is on the GAC agenda for
> Cartagena, I hope that some consideration will be given to the CWG
> recommendations during the discussions.
>
>
>
> Cheers, and safe travels to those heading out to Cartagena,
>
> Mary
>
>
>
>
>
> *Mary W S Wong*
>
> *Professor of Law*
>
> *Chair, Graduate IP Programs*
> UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAWTwo White StreetConcord, NH 03301
> USAEmail: mary.wong@xxxxxxx.eduPhone: 1-603-513-5143Webpage:
> http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.phpSelected writings available on
> the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at:
> http://ssrn.com/author=437584
>
>
>
>
>
> As of August 30, 2010, Franklin Pierce Law Center has affiliated with the
> University of New Hampshire and is now known as the *University of New
> Hampshire School of Law.* Please note that all email addresses have
> changed and now follow the convention: firstname.lastname@xxxxxxxxxxx. For
> more information on the *University of New Hampshire School of Law*, please
> visit *law.unh.edu*
>
>
>