<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [soac-mapo] Meeting with the ICANN Board
- To: soac-mapo <soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [soac-mapo] Meeting with the ICANN Board
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 08:47:39 -0500
And i am talking about something that had full consensus and was discussed in
the DT clarification.
Thank you very much.
a.
On 7 Dec 2010, at 08:01, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
>
> I was not suggesting representing all view points but those that had
> full consensus or consensus in the report plus those that had full
> support regarding the DT clarifications.
>
> Chuck
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx] On
>> Behalf Of Jon Nevett
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 7:55 AM
>> To: Avri Doria
>> Cc: soac-mapo
>> Subject: Re: [soac-mapo] Meeting with the ICANN Board
>>
>>
>> I agree with Avri -- not easy representing the various viewpoints on
>> these issues -- and encourage everyone to attend if constituency day
>> permits. Best, Jon
>>
>> On Dec 7, 2010, at 7:38 AM, Avri Doria wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> hi,
>>>
>>> I will certainly make it a point to break away to come.
>>>
>>> Since I did not know at a certain point in yesterday's meeting that
>> we were able to speak (i got there late because I am also in the JIG
> WG
>> which was meeting earlier and only saw only Kurt at the mike during
> the
>> discussion of the Q2) it did not occur to get up to speak and got
>> frustrated by the lack of explanation regarding Q2 Incitement to
>> discrimination clause. I was concerned that the discussion moved away
>> from it to things that were considered 'more meaty' letting that issue
>> drop as unimportant because at least for that viewpoint, no one on the
>> panel was representing the various viewpoints completely or
> accurately.
>>>
>>> a.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 7 Dec 2010, at 07:25, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> It might be helpful if a few GNSO CWG members could break away to
>> participate in this session. Might want to see if Jon Nevett could at
>> least. I think he would fairly represent the various points of view
> if
>> their members are not able to attend.
>>>>
>>>> Chuck
>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx]
>> On
>>>>> Behalf Of Marilyn Cade
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 7:02 AM
>>>>> To: Margie Milam ; soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>> Subject: Re: [soac-mapo] Meeting with the ICANN Board
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This is difficult/constituency meetings underway.
>>>>> Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Margie Milam <Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 04:52:03
>>>>> To: <soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> Subject: [soac-mapo] Meeting with the ICANN Board
>>>>>
>>>>> Dear All,
>>>>>
>>>>> As discussed in today's Rec6 consultation session, Peter Dengate
>>>>> Thrush and other board members would like to meet with the CWG
>> tomorrow
>>>>> afternoon. If you would like to meet with them, please plan
> on
>>>>> attending this meeting at the Mirador Room at 15:15-16:15.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Margie
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> __________
>>>>> Margie Milam
>>>>> Senior Policy Counselor
>>>>> ICANN
>>>>> __________
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|