ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[soac-mapo]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [soac-mapo] Meeting with the ICANN Board

  • To: soac-mapo <soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [soac-mapo] Meeting with the ICANN Board
  • From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 08:47:39 -0500

And i am talking about something that had full consensus and was discussed in 
the DT clarification.

Thank you very much.

a.

On 7 Dec 2010, at 08:01, Gomes, Chuck wrote:

> 
> I was not suggesting representing all view points but those that had
> full consensus or consensus in the report plus those that had full
> support regarding the DT clarifications.
> 
> Chuck
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx] On
>> Behalf Of Jon Nevett
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 7:55 AM
>> To: Avri Doria
>> Cc: soac-mapo
>> Subject: Re: [soac-mapo] Meeting with the ICANN Board
>> 
>> 
>> I agree with Avri -- not easy representing the various viewpoints on
>> these issues -- and encourage everyone to attend if constituency day
>> permits.  Best, Jon
>> 
>> On Dec 7, 2010, at 7:38 AM, Avri Doria wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> hi,
>>> 
>>> I will certainly make it a point to break away to come.
>>> 
>>> Since I did not know at a certain point in yesterday's meeting that
>> we were able to speak (i got there late because I am also in the JIG
> WG
>> which was meeting earlier and only saw only Kurt at the mike during
> the
>> discussion of the Q2) it did not occur to get up to speak and got
>> frustrated by the lack of explanation regarding Q2 Incitement to
>> discrimination clause.  I was concerned that the discussion moved away
>> from it to things that were considered 'more meaty' letting that issue
>> drop as unimportant because at least for that viewpoint, no one on the
>> panel was representing the various viewpoints completely or
> accurately.
>>> 
>>> a.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 7 Dec 2010, at 07:25, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> It might be helpful if a few GNSO CWG members could break away to
>> participate in this session.  Might want to see if Jon Nevett could at
>> least.  I think he would fairly represent the various points of view
> if
>> their members are not able to attend.
>>>> 
>>>> Chuck
>>>> 
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx]
>> On
>>>>> Behalf Of Marilyn Cade
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 7:02 AM
>>>>> To: Margie Milam ; soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>> Subject: Re: [soac-mapo] Meeting with the ICANN Board
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> This is difficult/constituency meetings underway.
>>>>> Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
>>>>> 
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Margie Milam <Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 04:52:03
>>>>> To: <soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> Subject: [soac-mapo] Meeting with the ICANN Board
>>>>> 
>>>>> Dear All,
>>>>> 
>>>>> As discussed in today's Rec6 consultation session,  Peter Dengate
>>>>> Thrush and other board members would like to meet with the CWG
>> tomorrow
>>>>> afternoon.      If you would like to meet with them, please plan
> on
>>>>> attending this meeting at  the Mirador Room at 15:15-16:15.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Margie
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> __________
>>>>> Margie Milam
>>>>> Senior Policy Counselor
>>>>> ICANN
>>>>> __________
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy