ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[soac-mapo]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [soac-mapo] Updated Letter

  • To: Jon Nevett <jon@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [soac-mapo] Updated Letter
  • From: Robin Gross <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 12:48:10 -0800

<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: 
space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">Hi 
Jon,<div><br></div><div>Thanks for your quick work turning this around. &nbsp;I 
made a few minor suggested tweaks to the para on the IO to reflect the 
clarification discussion we had on today's conf. call 
(attached).</div><div><br></div><div>Thank 
you,</div><div>Robin</div><div><br></div><div></div></body></html>

Attachment: Rec6 CWG Draft Response 010611-rdg1.doc
Description: MS-Word document

<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: 
space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; 
"><div></div><div><br></div><div><br><div><div>On Jan 6, 2011, at 12:26 PM, Jon 
Nevett wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote 
type="cite"><div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; 
-webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><div>Rec6 CWG 
Colleagues:</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks for everyone's time on today's 
call. &nbsp;Attached are redline and clean versions of the proposed letter to 
the Board. &nbsp;Please review and let the group know if you have any 
changes/substantive objections. &nbsp;We always have the option -- as we 
discussed on the call -- to append any objections from group members if they so 
desire. &nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>Please also take a close look at the 
last paragraph of the letter related to the name of the Rec6 objections. 
&nbsp;This came out of our final few minutes on the call. &nbsp;For one, I 
probably would delete this paragraph. &nbsp;It seems a bit petty and not all 
that helpful, but I don't feel strongly enough by any means to append an 
objection on it. &nbsp;I found an e-mail from Marika on September 13th with the 
following poll results, which I think somewhat weakens some of the points made 
on the call:</div><div><br></div><div><!--StartFragment-->

<div style="border-top-style: none; border-right-style: none; 
border-left-style: none; border-width: initial; border-color: initial; 
border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-color: windowtext; 
border-bottom-width: 1.5pt; padding-top: 0in; padding-right: 0in; 
padding-bottom: 0in; padding-left: 0in; position: static; z-index: auto; "><p 
class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:normal;border:none;mso-border-bottom-alt:
solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0in;mso-padding-alt:0in 0in 0in 0in"><span 
class="apple-style-span">a. 
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; "Objections
Based on the Principles of Ordre Public": 7/20</span><o:p></o:p></p><p 
class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:normal;border:none;mso-border-bottom-alt:
solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0in;mso-padding-alt:0in 0in 0in 0in"><span 
class="apple-style-span">b.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
 "Public
Order Objections": 0/20</span><span 
class="apple-style-span"><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" 
style="line-height:normal;border:none;mso-border-bottom-alt:
solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0in;mso-padding-alt:0in 0in 0in 0in"><span 
class="apple-style-span">c.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
 "Public
Interest Objections"</span><span class="apple-style-span">: 
8/20</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class="MsoNormal" 
style="line-height:normal;border:none;mso-border-bottom-alt:
solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0in;mso-padding-alt:0in 0in 0in 0in"><span 
class="apple-style-span">d.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
 "Objections
Based on General Principles of International Law':</span><span 
class="apple-style-span"> 14/20<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" 
style="line-height:normal;border:none;mso-border-bottom-alt:
solid windowtext 1.5pt;padding:0in;mso-padding-alt:0in 0in 0in 0in"><span 
class="apple-style-span">e.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
 &nbsp;“</span>Objections based on the General Principles of Ordre
Public or International Law”: 
9/20</p></div></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>As discussed, we are 
trying to have Chuck send the letter to the Board in the next 24 hours to meet 
the Board's deadline.</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks 
again.</div><div><br></div><div>Best,</div><div><br></div><div>Jon</div><div><br></div><div><br></div></div><span>&lt;Rec6
 CWG Draft Response Clean 010611.doc&gt;</span><div style="word-wrap: 
break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; 
"></div><span>&lt;Rec6 CWG Draft Response 010611.doc&gt;</span><div 
style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: 
after-white-space; "></div></blockquote></div><br><div>
<div style="font-size: 12px; "><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><br 
class="khtml-block-placeholder"></div><div style="font-size: 12px; "><br 
class="khtml-block-placeholder"></div><div style="font-size: 12px; ">IP 
JUSTICE</div><div style="font-size: 12px; ">Robin Gross, Executive 
Director</div><div style="font-size: 12px; ">1192 Haight Street, San Francisco, 
CA&nbsp; 94117&nbsp; USA</div><div style="font-size: 12px; ">p: +1-415-553-6261 
&nbsp; &nbsp;f: +1-415-462-6451</div><div style="font-size: 12px; ">w: <a 
href="http://www.ipjustice.org";>http://www.ipjustice.org</a>&nbsp; &nbsp; 
&nbsp;e:&nbsp;<a 
href="mailto:robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</a></div><span 
class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 12px; "><br 
class="Apple-interchange-newline"></span><br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
</div>
<br></div></body></html>


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy